Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study

This paper presents a multi-criteria methodology for prioritizing highway-rail grade crossings for grade separation or other major improvements. The traditional approach for making grade-crossing investment decisions has been guided primarily by the Federal Highway Administration Railroad–Highway Gr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob Mathew, Rahim F. Benekohal, Mark Berndt, Jeannie Beckett, Jeff McKerrow
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8e511e28ef09483e94b6c9de2a9ed4e8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8e511e28ef09483e94b6c9de2a9ed4e8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8e511e28ef09483e94b6c9de2a9ed4e82021-11-11T14:23:43ZMulti-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study2165-002010.1080/21650020.2021.1986422https://doaj.org/article/8e511e28ef09483e94b6c9de2a9ed4e82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2021.1986422https://doaj.org/toc/2165-0020This paper presents a multi-criteria methodology for prioritizing highway-rail grade crossings for grade separation or other major improvements. The traditional approach for making grade-crossing investment decisions has been guided primarily by the Federal Highway Administration Railroad–Highway Grade Crossing Handbook, which focuses heavily on traffic and safety-related factors. However, it does not consider other criteria such as economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, and livability. Due to factors including 1) increasing traffic demands resulting in significant delays at crossings, 2) the high cost of grade separation, 3) the long-lasting impact of grade separation on a community, and 4) funding requirements from grant applications, several factors should be considered in crossing selection. The main contributions of this paper are 1) a novel robust prioritization methodology that considers safety, economic, environmental, and community/livability. 2) a case study that prioritizes crossings at two separate rail corridors and a comparison of the results with the expert judgment. The case studies use data that is readily available to practitioners and implementation is fostered by the provision of an Excel Toolkit.Jacob MathewRahim F. BenekohalMark BerndtJeannie BeckettJeff McKerrowTaylor & Francis Grouparticlemulti-criteria methodhighway-rail grade crossinggrade crossing safetyranking and prioritizinggrade separationCity planningHT165.5-169.9Transportation and communicationsHE1-9990ENUrban, Planning and Transport Research, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 480-519 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic multi-criteria method
highway-rail grade crossing
grade crossing safety
ranking and prioritizing
grade separation
City planning
HT165.5-169.9
Transportation and communications
HE1-9990
spellingShingle multi-criteria method
highway-rail grade crossing
grade crossing safety
ranking and prioritizing
grade separation
City planning
HT165.5-169.9
Transportation and communications
HE1-9990
Jacob Mathew
Rahim F. Benekohal
Mark Berndt
Jeannie Beckett
Jeff McKerrow
Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
description This paper presents a multi-criteria methodology for prioritizing highway-rail grade crossings for grade separation or other major improvements. The traditional approach for making grade-crossing investment decisions has been guided primarily by the Federal Highway Administration Railroad–Highway Grade Crossing Handbook, which focuses heavily on traffic and safety-related factors. However, it does not consider other criteria such as economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, and livability. Due to factors including 1) increasing traffic demands resulting in significant delays at crossings, 2) the high cost of grade separation, 3) the long-lasting impact of grade separation on a community, and 4) funding requirements from grant applications, several factors should be considered in crossing selection. The main contributions of this paper are 1) a novel robust prioritization methodology that considers safety, economic, environmental, and community/livability. 2) a case study that prioritizes crossings at two separate rail corridors and a comparison of the results with the expert judgment. The case studies use data that is readily available to practitioners and implementation is fostered by the provision of an Excel Toolkit.
format article
author Jacob Mathew
Rahim F. Benekohal
Mark Berndt
Jeannie Beckett
Jeff McKerrow
author_facet Jacob Mathew
Rahim F. Benekohal
Mark Berndt
Jeannie Beckett
Jeff McKerrow
author_sort Jacob Mathew
title Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
title_short Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
title_full Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
title_fullStr Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
title_sort multi-criteria prioritization of highway-rail grade crossings for improvements: a case study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8e511e28ef09483e94b6c9de2a9ed4e8
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobmathew multicriteriaprioritizationofhighwayrailgradecrossingsforimprovementsacasestudy
AT rahimfbenekohal multicriteriaprioritizationofhighwayrailgradecrossingsforimprovementsacasestudy
AT markberndt multicriteriaprioritizationofhighwayrailgradecrossingsforimprovementsacasestudy
AT jeanniebeckett multicriteriaprioritizationofhighwayrailgradecrossingsforimprovementsacasestudy
AT jeffmckerrow multicriteriaprioritizationofhighwayrailgradecrossingsforimprovementsacasestudy
_version_ 1718438959669837824