Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring

Process and tool condition monitoring systems are a prerequisite for autonomous production. One approach to monitoring individual parts without complex cutting simulations is the transfer of knowledge among similar monitoring scenarios. This paper introduces a novel monitoring method which transfers...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berend Denkena, Benjamin Bergmann, Tobias H. Stiehl
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b96721
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b96721
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b967212021-11-25T18:12:16ZTransfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring10.3390/machines91102822075-1702https://doaj.org/article/8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b967212021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/11/282https://doaj.org/toc/2075-1702Process and tool condition monitoring systems are a prerequisite for autonomous production. One approach to monitoring individual parts without complex cutting simulations is the transfer of knowledge among similar monitoring scenarios. This paper introduces a novel monitoring method which transfers monitoring limits for process signals between different machine tools. The method calculates monitoring limits statistically from cutting processes carried out on one or more similar machines. The monitoring algorithm aims to detect general process anomalies online. Experiments comprise face-turning operations at five different lathes, four of which were of the same model. Results include the successful transfer of monitoring limits between machines of the same model for the detection of material anomalies. In comparison to an approach based on dynamic time warping (DTW) and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), the new method showed fewer false alarms and higher detection rates. However, for the transfer between different models of machines, the successful application of the new method is limited. This is predominantly due to limitations of the employed process component isolation and differences between machine models in terms of signal properties as well as execution speed.Berend DenkenaBenjamin BergmannTobias H. StiehlMDPI AGarticlemachine toolsturningprocess monitoringknowledge transferMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570ENMachines, Vol 9, Iss 282, p 282 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic machine tools
turning
process monitoring
knowledge transfer
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
spellingShingle machine tools
turning
process monitoring
knowledge transfer
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Berend Denkena
Benjamin Bergmann
Tobias H. Stiehl
Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
description Process and tool condition monitoring systems are a prerequisite for autonomous production. One approach to monitoring individual parts without complex cutting simulations is the transfer of knowledge among similar monitoring scenarios. This paper introduces a novel monitoring method which transfers monitoring limits for process signals between different machine tools. The method calculates monitoring limits statistically from cutting processes carried out on one or more similar machines. The monitoring algorithm aims to detect general process anomalies online. Experiments comprise face-turning operations at five different lathes, four of which were of the same model. Results include the successful transfer of monitoring limits between machines of the same model for the detection of material anomalies. In comparison to an approach based on dynamic time warping (DTW) and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), the new method showed fewer false alarms and higher detection rates. However, for the transfer between different models of machines, the successful application of the new method is limited. This is predominantly due to limitations of the employed process component isolation and differences between machine models in terms of signal properties as well as execution speed.
format article
author Berend Denkena
Benjamin Bergmann
Tobias H. Stiehl
author_facet Berend Denkena
Benjamin Bergmann
Tobias H. Stiehl
author_sort Berend Denkena
title Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
title_short Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
title_full Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
title_fullStr Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Transfer of Process References between Machine Tools for Online Tool Condition Monitoring
title_sort transfer of process references between machine tools for online tool condition monitoring
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8e5becade4af4eea846c016eb8b96721
work_keys_str_mv AT berenddenkena transferofprocessreferencesbetweenmachinetoolsforonlinetoolconditionmonitoring
AT benjaminbergmann transferofprocessreferencesbetweenmachinetoolsforonlinetoolconditionmonitoring
AT tobiashstiehl transferofprocessreferencesbetweenmachinetoolsforonlinetoolconditionmonitoring
_version_ 1718411510287433728