Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model.
Analysis using human body models has been performed to reduce the impact of accidents; however, no analysis has shown a relationship between lumbar and pelvic/spine angle and seat belts in reducing human damage from accidents. Lumbar and pelvic/spine angles were measured in 75 individuals and the me...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8e755afd5d9c40a5b4f8a4816729bbbd |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8e755afd5d9c40a5b4f8a4816729bbbd |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8e755afd5d9c40a5b4f8a4816729bbbd2021-12-02T20:09:24ZAnalysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0254120https://doaj.org/article/8e755afd5d9c40a5b4f8a4816729bbbd2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254120https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Analysis using human body models has been performed to reduce the impact of accidents; however, no analysis has shown a relationship between lumbar and pelvic/spine angle and seat belts in reducing human damage from accidents. Lumbar and pelvic/spine angles were measured in 75 individuals and the measurements were used to create three different angles for the Total Human Model for Safety model. In the present study, we focused on lumber lordosis (LL) and pelvic angle (PA). A normal distribution and histogram were used for analysis of PA (01, 10, and 50). The Total Human Model for Safety, including LL and PA, was corrected using finite element software. Simulations were conducted under the conditions of the Japan New Car Assessment Programme (JNCAP) 56 kph full lap frontal impact. Using the results of the FEM, the amount of lap-belt cranial sliding-up, anterior movement of the pelvis, posterior tilt of the pelvis, head injury criterion (HIC), second cervical vertebrae (C2) compressive load, C2 moment, chest deflectiou (upper, middle, and lower), left and right femur load, and shoulder belt force were measured. The lap-belt cranial sliding-up was 1.91 and 2.37 for PA10 and PA01, respectively, compared to PA50; the anterior movement of the pelvis was 1.08 and 1.12 for PA10 and PA01, respectively; and the posterior tilt of the pelvis was 1.1 and 1.18 for PA10 and PA01, respectively. HIC was 1.13 for PA10 and 1.58 for PA01; there was no difference in C2 compressive load by PA, but C2 moment increased to 1.59 for PA10 and 2.72 for PA01. It was found that as LL increases and the PA decreases, the seat belt becomes likely to catch the iliac bone, making it harder to cause injury. This study could help to reconsider the safe seat and seatbelt position in the future.Norihiro NishidaTomohiro IzumiyamaRyusuke AsahiFei JiangJunji OhgiHiroki YamagataYasuaki ImajoHidenori SuzukiMasahiro FunabaShigeru SugimotoMasanobu FukushimaXian ChenTakashi SakaiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254120 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Norihiro Nishida Tomohiro Izumiyama Ryusuke Asahi Fei Jiang Junji Ohgi Hiroki Yamagata Yasuaki Imajo Hidenori Suzuki Masahiro Funaba Shigeru Sugimoto Masanobu Fukushima Xian Chen Takashi Sakai Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
description |
Analysis using human body models has been performed to reduce the impact of accidents; however, no analysis has shown a relationship between lumbar and pelvic/spine angle and seat belts in reducing human damage from accidents. Lumbar and pelvic/spine angles were measured in 75 individuals and the measurements were used to create three different angles for the Total Human Model for Safety model. In the present study, we focused on lumber lordosis (LL) and pelvic angle (PA). A normal distribution and histogram were used for analysis of PA (01, 10, and 50). The Total Human Model for Safety, including LL and PA, was corrected using finite element software. Simulations were conducted under the conditions of the Japan New Car Assessment Programme (JNCAP) 56 kph full lap frontal impact. Using the results of the FEM, the amount of lap-belt cranial sliding-up, anterior movement of the pelvis, posterior tilt of the pelvis, head injury criterion (HIC), second cervical vertebrae (C2) compressive load, C2 moment, chest deflectiou (upper, middle, and lower), left and right femur load, and shoulder belt force were measured. The lap-belt cranial sliding-up was 1.91 and 2.37 for PA10 and PA01, respectively, compared to PA50; the anterior movement of the pelvis was 1.08 and 1.12 for PA10 and PA01, respectively; and the posterior tilt of the pelvis was 1.1 and 1.18 for PA10 and PA01, respectively. HIC was 1.13 for PA10 and 1.58 for PA01; there was no difference in C2 compressive load by PA, but C2 moment increased to 1.59 for PA10 and 2.72 for PA01. It was found that as LL increases and the PA decreases, the seat belt becomes likely to catch the iliac bone, making it harder to cause injury. This study could help to reconsider the safe seat and seatbelt position in the future. |
format |
article |
author |
Norihiro Nishida Tomohiro Izumiyama Ryusuke Asahi Fei Jiang Junji Ohgi Hiroki Yamagata Yasuaki Imajo Hidenori Suzuki Masahiro Funaba Shigeru Sugimoto Masanobu Fukushima Xian Chen Takashi Sakai |
author_facet |
Norihiro Nishida Tomohiro Izumiyama Ryusuke Asahi Fei Jiang Junji Ohgi Hiroki Yamagata Yasuaki Imajo Hidenori Suzuki Masahiro Funaba Shigeru Sugimoto Masanobu Fukushima Xian Chen Takashi Sakai |
author_sort |
Norihiro Nishida |
title |
Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
title_short |
Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
title_full |
Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
title_sort |
analysis of individual differences in pelvic and spine alignment in seated posture and impact on the seatbelt kinematics using human body model. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8e755afd5d9c40a5b4f8a4816729bbbd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT norihironishida analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT tomohiroizumiyama analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT ryusukeasahi analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT feijiang analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT junjiohgi analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT hirokiyamagata analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT yasuakiimajo analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT hidenorisuzuki analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT masahirofunaba analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT shigerusugimoto analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT masanobufukushima analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT xianchen analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel AT takashisakai analysisofindividualdifferencesinpelvicandspinealignmentinseatedpostureandimpactontheseatbeltkinematicsusinghumanbodymodel |
_version_ |
1718375074659041280 |