Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis

This study is aimed at scrutinizing the domestic solar energy potential for electricity and hydrogen production. Under the first scenario, it is sought to evaluate electricity generation for household purposes using RSUs (rooftop solar units). Then, under the second scenario, solar hydrogen producti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostafa Rezaei, Mehdi Jahangiri, Armin Razmjoo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8eb2b4e73cce48ec802572a27167bac7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8eb2b4e73cce48ec802572a27167bac7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8eb2b4e73cce48ec802572a27167bac72021-11-22T01:11:27ZUtilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis1687-529X10.1155/2021/8858082https://doaj.org/article/8eb2b4e73cce48ec802572a27167bac72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8858082https://doaj.org/toc/1687-529XThis study is aimed at scrutinizing the domestic solar energy potential for electricity and hydrogen production. Under the first scenario, it is sought to evaluate electricity generation for household purposes using RSUs (rooftop solar units). Then, under the second scenario, solar hydrogen production is analyzed for the purpose of meeting a hydrogen vehicle demand. For this, one of the aptest cities, Yazd, located in the center of Iran is investigated. Furthermore, a real-world electric load needed by an usual household in Yazd is deemed as the demand for electricity. To analyze the two scenarios, a system consisting of an 8.2 kW RSU for power generation, a battery for electricity storage, and a 1 kW electrolyzer for hydrogen yield is proposed. Also, to acquire a broader vision, predictions are made for the next 10, 20, 30, and 40 years. The results regarding the first scenario implied that COE (Cost of Electricity) would be, respectively, 0.067, 0.145, 0.136, and 0.127 $/kWh. In addition to supplying the electricity required by the house, 2,687 $/yr could be earned by selling the excess electricity generated, and 5,759 kg of CO2 would be avoided a year. The findings as to the second scenario showed that LCOH (levelized cost of hydrogen) would equate to 3.62, 6.53, 6.34, and 5.93 $/kg, respectively, for the aforementioned project lifetimes. Furthermore, 2,464 $/yr would be the revenue after selling the surplus electricity, and 7,820 kg of CO2 would be saved, annually.Mostafa RezaeiMehdi JahangiriArmin RazmjooHindawi LimitedarticleRenewable energy sourcesTJ807-830ENInternational Journal of Photoenergy, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
spellingShingle Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Mostafa Rezaei
Mehdi Jahangiri
Armin Razmjoo
Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis
description This study is aimed at scrutinizing the domestic solar energy potential for electricity and hydrogen production. Under the first scenario, it is sought to evaluate electricity generation for household purposes using RSUs (rooftop solar units). Then, under the second scenario, solar hydrogen production is analyzed for the purpose of meeting a hydrogen vehicle demand. For this, one of the aptest cities, Yazd, located in the center of Iran is investigated. Furthermore, a real-world electric load needed by an usual household in Yazd is deemed as the demand for electricity. To analyze the two scenarios, a system consisting of an 8.2 kW RSU for power generation, a battery for electricity storage, and a 1 kW electrolyzer for hydrogen yield is proposed. Also, to acquire a broader vision, predictions are made for the next 10, 20, 30, and 40 years. The results regarding the first scenario implied that COE (Cost of Electricity) would be, respectively, 0.067, 0.145, 0.136, and 0.127 $/kWh. In addition to supplying the electricity required by the house, 2,687 $/yr could be earned by selling the excess electricity generated, and 5,759 kg of CO2 would be avoided a year. The findings as to the second scenario showed that LCOH (levelized cost of hydrogen) would equate to 3.62, 6.53, 6.34, and 5.93 $/kg, respectively, for the aforementioned project lifetimes. Furthermore, 2,464 $/yr would be the revenue after selling the surplus electricity, and 7,820 kg of CO2 would be saved, annually.
format article
author Mostafa Rezaei
Mehdi Jahangiri
Armin Razmjoo
author_facet Mostafa Rezaei
Mehdi Jahangiri
Armin Razmjoo
author_sort Mostafa Rezaei
title Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis
title_short Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis
title_full Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis
title_fullStr Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of Rooftop Solar Units to Generate Electricity and Hydrogen: A Technoeconomic Analysis
title_sort utilization of rooftop solar units to generate electricity and hydrogen: a technoeconomic analysis
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8eb2b4e73cce48ec802572a27167bac7
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafarezaei utilizationofrooftopsolarunitstogenerateelectricityandhydrogenatechnoeconomicanalysis
AT mehdijahangiri utilizationofrooftopsolarunitstogenerateelectricityandhydrogenatechnoeconomicanalysis
AT arminrazmjoo utilizationofrooftopsolarunitstogenerateelectricityandhydrogenatechnoeconomicanalysis
_version_ 1718418294600368128