How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context

Justice is relevant in various domains of life, including the state. The social identity-based procedural justice theories (Group Value Model and Group Engagement Model) emphasize the importance of procedural justice from the authority in signaling the group’s inclusion and respect, thus increasing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andina Mega Larasati, Joevarian Hudiyana, Hamdi Muluk
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	ID
Publicado:	Universitas Gadjah Mada 2021
Materias:	group engagement: group value procedural justice social identity state Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8eb444bb436147c4b8a67cc059c419bf
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8eb444bb436147c4b8a67cc059c419bf
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8eb444bb436147c4b8a67cc059c419bf2021-12-02T05:25:01ZHow is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context0854-71062528-585810.22146/buletinpsikologi.64101https://doaj.org/article/8eb444bb436147c4b8a67cc059c419bf2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/buletinpsikologi/article/view/64101https://doaj.org/toc/0854-7106https://doaj.org/toc/2528-5858Justice is relevant in various domains of life, including the state. The social identity-based procedural justice theories (Group Value Model and Group Engagement Model) emphasize the importance of procedural justice from the authority in signaling the group’s inclusion and respect, thus increasing individuals’ cooperation and compliance. This article aims to critically review published literature using the two models in a national context, of which there were inconsistent findings regarding the role of group identification. Three issues are underlying this inconsistency. First, both models could be applied when national identity was salient, such as legal compliance (to taxation and traffic law). Second, perceived police legitimacy is a better mediator when the national identity was not salient (e. g. cooperation in counter-terrorism and crowd policing). Third, the effect of procedural justice depends on the motivation to secure identity (which is generally higher among minority/marginalized groups). As both models are strongly bound by context, the author suggests controlling police-national identity prototypicality on studies about police procedural justice, attitude toward outgroup and relational identification with the police on studies involving intergroup conflict, and uncertainty about membership status on studies toward minority groups. Hopefully, this article could contribute references and encourage related studies in Indonesia.Andina Mega LarasatiJoevarian HudiyanaHamdi MulukUniversitas Gadjah Madaarticlegroup engagement: group valueprocedural justicesocial identitystatePsychologyBF1-990IDBuletin Psikologi, Vol 29, Iss 2, Pp 138-160 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	ID
topic	group engagement: group value procedural justice social identity state Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	group engagement: group value procedural justice social identity state Psychology BF1-990 Andina Mega Larasati Joevarian Hudiyana Hamdi Muluk How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context
description	Justice is relevant in various domains of life, including the state. The social identity-based procedural justice theories (Group Value Model and Group Engagement Model) emphasize the importance of procedural justice from the authority in signaling the group’s inclusion and respect, thus increasing individuals’ cooperation and compliance. This article aims to critically review published literature using the two models in a national context, of which there were inconsistent findings regarding the role of group identification. Three issues are underlying this inconsistency. First, both models could be applied when national identity was salient, such as legal compliance (to taxation and traffic law). Second, perceived police legitimacy is a better mediator when the national identity was not salient (e. g. cooperation in counter-terrorism and crowd policing). Third, the effect of procedural justice depends on the motivation to secure identity (which is generally higher among minority/marginalized groups). As both models are strongly bound by context, the author suggests controlling police-national identity prototypicality on studies about police procedural justice, attitude toward outgroup and relational identification with the police on studies involving intergroup conflict, and uncertainty about membership status on studies toward minority groups. Hopefully, this article could contribute references and encourage related studies in Indonesia.
format	article
author	Andina Mega Larasati Joevarian Hudiyana Hamdi Muluk
author_facet	Andina Mega Larasati Joevarian Hudiyana Hamdi Muluk
author_sort	Andina Mega Larasati
title	How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context
title_short	How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context
title_full	How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context
title_fullStr	How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context
title_full_unstemmed	How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context
title_sort	how is the state perceived as fair? a literature review of social identity-based procedural justice in the national context
publisher	Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8eb444bb436147c4b8a67cc059c419bf
work_keys_str_mv	AT andinamegalarasati howisthestateperceivedasfairaliteraturereviewofsocialidentitybasedproceduraljusticeinthenationalcontext AT joevarianhudiyana howisthestateperceivedasfairaliteraturereviewofsocialidentitybasedproceduraljusticeinthenationalcontext AT hamdimuluk howisthestateperceivedasfairaliteraturereviewofsocialidentitybasedproceduraljusticeinthenationalcontext
_version_	1718400427494473728

How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context

Ejemplares similares