Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
ABSTRACT Proposals to improve the reproducibility of biomedical research have emphasized scientific rigor. Although the word “rigor” is widely used, there has been little specific discussion as to what it means and how it can be achieved. We suggest that scientific rigor combines elements of mathema...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8ef57266a7c64dd9846929edec4dc48d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8ef57266a7c64dd9846929edec4dc48d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8ef57266a7c64dd9846929edec4dc48d2021-11-15T15:50:17ZRigorous Science: a How-To Guide10.1128/mBio.01902-162150-7511https://doaj.org/article/8ef57266a7c64dd9846929edec4dc48d2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.01902-16https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT Proposals to improve the reproducibility of biomedical research have emphasized scientific rigor. Although the word “rigor” is widely used, there has been little specific discussion as to what it means and how it can be achieved. We suggest that scientific rigor combines elements of mathematics, logic, philosophy, and ethics. We propose a framework for rigor that includes redundant experimental design, sound statistical analysis, recognition of error, avoidance of logical fallacies, and intellectual honesty. These elements lead to five actionable recommendations for research education.Arturo CasadevallFerric C. FangAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 7, Iss 6 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Microbiology QR1-502 |
spellingShingle |
Microbiology QR1-502 Arturo Casadevall Ferric C. Fang Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide |
description |
ABSTRACT Proposals to improve the reproducibility of biomedical research have emphasized scientific rigor. Although the word “rigor” is widely used, there has been little specific discussion as to what it means and how it can be achieved. We suggest that scientific rigor combines elements of mathematics, logic, philosophy, and ethics. We propose a framework for rigor that includes redundant experimental design, sound statistical analysis, recognition of error, avoidance of logical fallacies, and intellectual honesty. These elements lead to five actionable recommendations for research education. |
format |
article |
author |
Arturo Casadevall Ferric C. Fang |
author_facet |
Arturo Casadevall Ferric C. Fang |
author_sort |
Arturo Casadevall |
title |
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide |
title_short |
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide |
title_full |
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide |
title_fullStr |
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide |
title_sort |
rigorous science: a how-to guide |
publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8ef57266a7c64dd9846929edec4dc48d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arturocasadevall rigorousscienceahowtoguide AT ferriccfang rigorousscienceahowtoguide |
_version_ |
1718427412372389888 |