Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test

Abstract When children have visual and/or oculomotor deficits, early diagnosis is critical for rehabilitation. The developmental eye movement (DEM) test is a visual-verbal number naming test that aims to measure oculomotor dysfunction in children by comparing scores on a horizontal and vertical subt...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nouk Tanke, Annemiek D. Barsingerhorn, F. Nienke Boonstra, Jeroen Goossens
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8efbc2052c5048bfaf72fcd49b8067b8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8efbc2052c5048bfaf72fcd49b8067b8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8efbc2052c5048bfaf72fcd49b8067b82021-12-02T14:01:23ZVisual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test10.1038/s41598-020-80870-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/8efbc2052c5048bfaf72fcd49b8067b82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80870-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract When children have visual and/or oculomotor deficits, early diagnosis is critical for rehabilitation. The developmental eye movement (DEM) test is a visual-verbal number naming test that aims to measure oculomotor dysfunction in children by comparing scores on a horizontal and vertical subtest. However, empirical comparison of oculomotor behavior during the two subtests is missing. Here, we measured eye movements of healthy children while they performed a digital version of the DEM. In addition, we measured visual processing speed using the Speed Acuity test. We found that parameters of saccade behavior, such as the number, amplitude, and direction of saccades, correlated with performance on the horizontal, but not the vertical subtest. However, the time spent on making saccades was very short compared to the time spent on number fixations and the total time needed for either subtest. Fixation durations correlated positively with performance on both subtests and co-varied tightly with visual processing speed. Accordingly, horizontal and vertical DEM scores showed a strong positive correlation with visual processing speed. We therefore conclude that the DEM is not suitable to measure saccade behavior, but can be a useful indicator of visual-verbal naming skills, visual processing speed, and other cognitive factors of clinical relevance.Nouk TankeAnnemiek D. BarsingerhornF. Nienke BoonstraJeroen GoossensNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Nouk Tanke
Annemiek D. Barsingerhorn
F. Nienke Boonstra
Jeroen Goossens
Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
description Abstract When children have visual and/or oculomotor deficits, early diagnosis is critical for rehabilitation. The developmental eye movement (DEM) test is a visual-verbal number naming test that aims to measure oculomotor dysfunction in children by comparing scores on a horizontal and vertical subtest. However, empirical comparison of oculomotor behavior during the two subtests is missing. Here, we measured eye movements of healthy children while they performed a digital version of the DEM. In addition, we measured visual processing speed using the Speed Acuity test. We found that parameters of saccade behavior, such as the number, amplitude, and direction of saccades, correlated with performance on the horizontal, but not the vertical subtest. However, the time spent on making saccades was very short compared to the time spent on number fixations and the total time needed for either subtest. Fixation durations correlated positively with performance on both subtests and co-varied tightly with visual processing speed. Accordingly, horizontal and vertical DEM scores showed a strong positive correlation with visual processing speed. We therefore conclude that the DEM is not suitable to measure saccade behavior, but can be a useful indicator of visual-verbal naming skills, visual processing speed, and other cognitive factors of clinical relevance.
format article
author Nouk Tanke
Annemiek D. Barsingerhorn
F. Nienke Boonstra
Jeroen Goossens
author_facet Nouk Tanke
Annemiek D. Barsingerhorn
F. Nienke Boonstra
Jeroen Goossens
author_sort Nouk Tanke
title Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
title_short Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
title_full Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
title_fullStr Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
title_full_unstemmed Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
title_sort visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8efbc2052c5048bfaf72fcd49b8067b8
work_keys_str_mv AT nouktanke visualfixationsratherthansaccadesdominatethedevelopmentaleyemovementtest
AT annemiekdbarsingerhorn visualfixationsratherthansaccadesdominatethedevelopmentaleyemovementtest
AT fnienkeboonstra visualfixationsratherthansaccadesdominatethedevelopmentaleyemovementtest
AT jeroengoossens visualfixationsratherthansaccadesdominatethedevelopmentaleyemovementtest
_version_ 1718392155934818304