Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness

Adults under community corrections supervision and who have a mental illness (MI) are expected to comply with conditions of release which often include involvement with supportive social services. The rates of technical violation, arrest, and incarceration that result from failure to comply with the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Jason Matejkowski
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	community corrections shared decision making dual role mental illness stigma strengths Psychiatry RC435-571
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8f09b957b53543a9a75e3ac944ff0d6b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8f09b957b53543a9a75e3ac944ff0d6b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8f09b957b53543a9a75e3ac944ff0d6b2021-11-04T05:16:16ZChallenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness1664-064010.3389/fpsyt.2021.773411https://doaj.org/article/8f09b957b53543a9a75e3ac944ff0d6b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.773411/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-0640Adults under community corrections supervision and who have a mental illness (MI) are expected to comply with conditions of release which often include involvement with supportive social services. The rates of technical violation, arrest, and incarceration that result from failure to comply with these mandates are exceedingly high. Shared decision making among officer-supervisors and client-supervisees is a promising approach to promote engagement in community corrections services among supervisees who have MI. This paper reviews recent research on shared decision making and identifies three barriers to its implementation in this context: (1) a lack of role clarity, (2) a predilection for risk avoidance, and (3) stigma toward supervisees. Empirically supported recommendations are suggested to aid in overcoming these obstacles, facilitate shared decision making, and promote recovery among this population: (1) unification of supervisor rehabilitative and public safety roles, (2) maximizing opportunities for self-determination through low-stakes events and/or enhancement of supervisee strengths and capabilities, and (3) supervisor training in principles of mental health recovery.Jason MatejkowskiFrontiers Media S.A.articlecommunity correctionsshared decision makingdual rolemental illnessstigmastrengthsPsychiatryRC435-571ENFrontiers in Psychiatry, Vol 12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	community corrections shared decision making dual role mental illness stigma strengths Psychiatry RC435-571
spellingShingle	community corrections shared decision making dual role mental illness stigma strengths Psychiatry RC435-571 Jason Matejkowski Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness
description	Adults under community corrections supervision and who have a mental illness (MI) are expected to comply with conditions of release which often include involvement with supportive social services. The rates of technical violation, arrest, and incarceration that result from failure to comply with these mandates are exceedingly high. Shared decision making among officer-supervisors and client-supervisees is a promising approach to promote engagement in community corrections services among supervisees who have MI. This paper reviews recent research on shared decision making and identifies three barriers to its implementation in this context: (1) a lack of role clarity, (2) a predilection for risk avoidance, and (3) stigma toward supervisees. Empirically supported recommendations are suggested to aid in overcoming these obstacles, facilitate shared decision making, and promote recovery among this population: (1) unification of supervisor rehabilitative and public safety roles, (2) maximizing opportunities for self-determination through low-stakes events and/or enhancement of supervisee strengths and capabilities, and (3) supervisor training in principles of mental health recovery.
format	article
author	Jason Matejkowski
author_facet	Jason Matejkowski
author_sort	Jason Matejkowski
title	Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness
title_short	Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness
title_full	Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness
title_fullStr	Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness
title_full_unstemmed	Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness
title_sort	challenges to employing shared decision making with adults under community supervision who have a mental illness
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8f09b957b53543a9a75e3ac944ff0d6b
work_keys_str_mv	AT jasonmatejkowski challengestoemployingshareddecisionmakingwithadultsundercommunitysupervisionwhohaveamentalillness
_version_	1718445225034121216

Challenges to Employing Shared Decision Making With Adults Under Community Supervision Who Have a Mental Illness

Ejemplares similares