Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept

The article discusses the use and transformation of the American scientific concept "soft power" in official Russian and US foreign policy rhetoric with the methodological help of Habermas' communicative action theory and its adoption to IR by T. Risse. In mainstream IR the proliferat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: M. V. Kharkevich
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2014
Materias:
us
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8f25917fdfa1461c89c9c7aadba58a51
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8f25917fdfa1461c89c9c7aadba58a51
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8f25917fdfa1461c89c9c7aadba58a512021-11-23T14:50:56ZSoft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2014-2-35-22-29https://doaj.org/article/8f25917fdfa1461c89c9c7aadba58a512014-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/59https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The article discusses the use and transformation of the American scientific concept "soft power" in official Russian and US foreign policy rhetoric with the methodological help of Habermas' communicative action theory and its adoption to IR by T. Risse. In mainstream IR the proliferation of the "soft power" concept is viewed in terms of ideological competition among states. The author argues that it is better to view this process as a form of international political deliberations on new forms of power in world politics. The article shows that there's no communicative action of US and Russia based on their tentative discussion of the "soft power" concept. On of reasons might be the lack of interest of both states for the concept as an ideological basis for cooperative actions. For Russia soft power in its classical form might be used towards its near abroad and probably BIC states. In dealings with western states Russian soft power turns into lobbyism and propaganda which is strictly not soft power. US under Obama have basically refuted the concept, having changed it for analytically meaningless "smart power". The conclusion is that communicative action requires prior existence of commutative rationality. This type of rationality is evident among postmodern states - the EU member states - and apparently absent among modern states such as Russia and US.M. V. KharkevichMGIMO University Pressarticle«мягкая сила»soft powercommunicative actionusrussiacommunicative rationalityInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 2(35), Pp 22-29 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic «мягкая сила»
soft power
communicative action
us
russia
communicative rationality
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle «мягкая сила»
soft power
communicative action
us
russia
communicative rationality
International relations
JZ2-6530
M. V. Kharkevich
Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept
description The article discusses the use and transformation of the American scientific concept "soft power" in official Russian and US foreign policy rhetoric with the methodological help of Habermas' communicative action theory and its adoption to IR by T. Risse. In mainstream IR the proliferation of the "soft power" concept is viewed in terms of ideological competition among states. The author argues that it is better to view this process as a form of international political deliberations on new forms of power in world politics. The article shows that there's no communicative action of US and Russia based on their tentative discussion of the "soft power" concept. On of reasons might be the lack of interest of both states for the concept as an ideological basis for cooperative actions. For Russia soft power in its classical form might be used towards its near abroad and probably BIC states. In dealings with western states Russian soft power turns into lobbyism and propaganda which is strictly not soft power. US under Obama have basically refuted the concept, having changed it for analytically meaningless "smart power". The conclusion is that communicative action requires prior existence of commutative rationality. This type of rationality is evident among postmodern states - the EU member states - and apparently absent among modern states such as Russia and US.
format article
author M. V. Kharkevich
author_facet M. V. Kharkevich
author_sort M. V. Kharkevich
title Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept
title_short Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept
title_full Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept
title_fullStr Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept
title_full_unstemmed Soft Power: Political Use of A Scientific Concept
title_sort soft power: political use of a scientific concept
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/8f25917fdfa1461c89c9c7aadba58a51
work_keys_str_mv AT mvkharkevich softpowerpoliticaluseofascientificconcept
_version_ 1718416342453846016