Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review

<h4>Objective</h4> To review the impact of clinical supervision of post-registration/qualification healthcare professionals on healthcare organisational outcomes. <h4>Background</h4> Clinical supervision is a professional support mechanism that benefits patients, healthcare p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Priya Martin, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Saravana Kumar, David Snowdon
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8f3d9fd3c5544e859cc30b56b084b8f8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8f3d9fd3c5544e859cc30b56b084b8f8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8f3d9fd3c5544e859cc30b56b084b8f82021-11-25T06:19:26ZImpact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/8f3d9fd3c5544e859cc30b56b084b8f82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604366/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4> To review the impact of clinical supervision of post-registration/qualification healthcare professionals on healthcare organisational outcomes. <h4>Background</h4> Clinical supervision is a professional support mechanism that benefits patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare organisations. Whilst evidence is growing on the impact of clinical supervision on patient and healthcare professional outcomes, the evidence base for the impact of clinical supervision on organisational outcomes remains weak. <h4>Methods</h4> This review used a convergent segregated approach to synthesise and integrate quantitative and qualitative research findings, as per the Joanna Briggs Institute’s recommendations for mixed methods systematic reviews. Databases searched included CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PschINFO, and Scopus. Whilst a narrative synthesis was performed to present the findings of the quantitative and qualitative studies, the evidence from both quantitative and qualitative studies was subsequently integrated for a combined presentation. The review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. <h4>Results</h4> Thirty-two studies including 27 quantitative, two qualitative and three mixed methods studies, were included in the review. The results of the quantitative analysis showed that effective clinical supervision was associated with lower burnout and greater staff retention, and effective supervisor was associated with lower burnout and greater job satisfaction. Qualitative findings showed that healthcare professionals believed that adequate clinical supervision could mitigate the risk of burnout, facilitate staff retention, and improve the work environment, while inadequate clinical supervision can lead to stress and burnout. The evidence from quantitative and qualitative studies were complementary of each other. <h4>Conclusion</h4> Clinical supervision can have a variable effect on healthcare organisational outcomes. The direction of this effect appears to be influenced by the effectiveness of both the clinical supervision provided and that of the clinical supervisor. This highlights the need for organisations to invest in high quality supervision practices if maximal gains from clinical supervision are to be attained.Priya MartinLucylynn LizarondoSaravana KumarDavid SnowdonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Priya Martin Lucylynn Lizarondo Saravana Kumar David Snowdon Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
description	<h4>Objective</h4> To review the impact of clinical supervision of post-registration/qualification healthcare professionals on healthcare organisational outcomes. <h4>Background</h4> Clinical supervision is a professional support mechanism that benefits patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare organisations. Whilst evidence is growing on the impact of clinical supervision on patient and healthcare professional outcomes, the evidence base for the impact of clinical supervision on organisational outcomes remains weak. <h4>Methods</h4> This review used a convergent segregated approach to synthesise and integrate quantitative and qualitative research findings, as per the Joanna Briggs Institute’s recommendations for mixed methods systematic reviews. Databases searched included CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PschINFO, and Scopus. Whilst a narrative synthesis was performed to present the findings of the quantitative and qualitative studies, the evidence from both quantitative and qualitative studies was subsequently integrated for a combined presentation. The review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. <h4>Results</h4> Thirty-two studies including 27 quantitative, two qualitative and three mixed methods studies, were included in the review. The results of the quantitative analysis showed that effective clinical supervision was associated with lower burnout and greater staff retention, and effective supervisor was associated with lower burnout and greater job satisfaction. Qualitative findings showed that healthcare professionals believed that adequate clinical supervision could mitigate the risk of burnout, facilitate staff retention, and improve the work environment, while inadequate clinical supervision can lead to stress and burnout. The evidence from quantitative and qualitative studies were complementary of each other. <h4>Conclusion</h4> Clinical supervision can have a variable effect on healthcare organisational outcomes. The direction of this effect appears to be influenced by the effectiveness of both the clinical supervision provided and that of the clinical supervisor. This highlights the need for organisations to invest in high quality supervision practices if maximal gains from clinical supervision are to be attained.
format	article
author	Priya Martin Lucylynn Lizarondo Saravana Kumar David Snowdon
author_facet	Priya Martin Lucylynn Lizarondo Saravana Kumar David Snowdon
author_sort	Priya Martin
title	Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
title_short	Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
title_full	Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
title_fullStr	Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed	Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review
title_sort	impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8f3d9fd3c5544e859cc30b56b084b8f8
work_keys_str_mv	AT priyamartin impactofclinicalsupervisiononhealthcareorganisationaloutcomesamixedmethodssystematicreview AT lucylynnlizarondo impactofclinicalsupervisiononhealthcareorganisationaloutcomesamixedmethodssystematicreview AT saravanakumar impactofclinicalsupervisiononhealthcareorganisationaloutcomesamixedmethodssystematicreview AT davidsnowdon impactofclinicalsupervisiononhealthcareorganisationaloutcomesamixedmethodssystematicreview
_version_	1718413876808122368

Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review

Ejemplares similares