Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG

Betina Børresen,1 Anders Elias Hansen,2,3 Frederikke Petrine Fliedner,2 Jonas Rosager Henriksen,3 Dennis Ringkjøbing Elema,3,4 Malene Brandt-Larsen,5 Lotte Kellemann Kristensen,2– 6 Annemarie Thuri Kristensen,1– 6 Thomas Lars Andresen,3 Andreas Kjæ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Børresen B, Hansen AE, Fliedner FP, Henriksen JR, Elema DR, Brandt-Larsen M, Kristensen LK, Kristensen AT, Andresen TL, Kjær A
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8f5d2a79b6c5463abbcc5f3b65bf21ef
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8f5d2a79b6c5463abbcc5f3b65bf21ef
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8f5d2a79b6c5463abbcc5f3b65bf21ef2021-12-02T15:16:52ZNoninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG1178-2013https://doaj.org/article/8f5d2a79b6c5463abbcc5f3b65bf21ef2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/noninvasive-molecular-imaging-of-the-enhanced-permeability-and-retenti-peer-reviewed-article-IJNhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013Betina Børresen,1 Anders Elias Hansen,2,3 Frederikke Petrine Fliedner,2 Jonas Rosager Henriksen,3 Dennis Ringkjøbing Elema,3,4 Malene Brandt-Larsen,5 Lotte Kellemann Kristensen,2– 6 Annemarie Thuri Kristensen,1– 6 Thomas Lars Andresen,3 Andreas Kjær2,5 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark; 2Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N 2200, Denmark; 3DTU Health Technology, Center for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Kgs 2800, Denmark; 4DTU Health Technology, The Hevesy Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Technologies, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark; 5Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen Ø 2100, Denmark; 6Minerva Imaging, Copenhagen N 2200, DenmarkCorrespondence: Andreas KjærCluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N 2200, DenmarkTel +45 35 32 75 04Fax +45 35 32 75 46Email akjaer@sund.ku.dkBackground: The accumulation of liposome encapsulated chemotherapy in solid cancers is dependent on the presence of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with a liposome encapsulated radioisotope, such as liposome encapsulated Cu-64 (64Cu-liposome) may help to identify tumors with high liposome accumulation, and thereby stratify patients based on expected benefit from liposomal chemotherapy. However, intravenous administration of liposomes without a cytotoxic content is complicated by the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon for succeeding therapeutic liposome dosing. Alternative markers for assessing the tumor’s EPR level are therefore warranted.Materials and Methods: To increase our understanding of EPR variations and to ultimately identify an alternative marker for the EPR effect, we investigated the correlation between 64Cu-liposome PET/CT (EPR effect) and 68Ga-RGD PET/CT (neoangiogenesis), 18F-FDG PET/CT (glycolysis), diffusion-weighted MRI (diffusivity) and interstitial fluid pressure in two experimental cancer models (CT26 and COLO 205).Results: 64Cu-liposome and 68Ga-RGD SUVmax displayed a significant moderate correlation, however, none of the other parameters evaluated displayed significant correlations. These results indicate that differences in neoangiogenesis may explain some EPR variability, however, as correlations were only moderate and not observed for SUVmean, 68Ga-RGD is probably insufficient to serve as a stand-alone surrogate marker for quantifying the EPR effect and stratifying patients.Keywords: EPR effect, liposome, positron emission tomography, neoangiogenesisBørresen BHansen AEFliedner FPHenriksen JRElema DRBrandt-Larsen MKristensen LKKristensen ATAndresen TLKjær ADove Medical Pressarticleepr effectliposomepositron emission tomographyneoangiogenesisMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol Volume 15, Pp 8571-8581 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic epr effect
liposome
positron emission tomography
neoangiogenesis
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle epr effect
liposome
positron emission tomography
neoangiogenesis
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Børresen B
Hansen AE
Fliedner FP
Henriksen JR
Elema DR
Brandt-Larsen M
Kristensen LK
Kristensen AT
Andresen TL
Kjær A
Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG
description Betina Børresen,1 Anders Elias Hansen,2,3 Frederikke Petrine Fliedner,2 Jonas Rosager Henriksen,3 Dennis Ringkjøbing Elema,3,4 Malene Brandt-Larsen,5 Lotte Kellemann Kristensen,2– 6 Annemarie Thuri Kristensen,1– 6 Thomas Lars Andresen,3 Andreas Kjær2,5 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark; 2Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N 2200, Denmark; 3DTU Health Technology, Center for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Kgs 2800, Denmark; 4DTU Health Technology, The Hevesy Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Technologies, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark; 5Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen Ø 2100, Denmark; 6Minerva Imaging, Copenhagen N 2200, DenmarkCorrespondence: Andreas KjærCluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen N 2200, DenmarkTel +45 35 32 75 04Fax +45 35 32 75 46Email akjaer@sund.ku.dkBackground: The accumulation of liposome encapsulated chemotherapy in solid cancers is dependent on the presence of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with a liposome encapsulated radioisotope, such as liposome encapsulated Cu-64 (64Cu-liposome) may help to identify tumors with high liposome accumulation, and thereby stratify patients based on expected benefit from liposomal chemotherapy. However, intravenous administration of liposomes without a cytotoxic content is complicated by the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon for succeeding therapeutic liposome dosing. Alternative markers for assessing the tumor’s EPR level are therefore warranted.Materials and Methods: To increase our understanding of EPR variations and to ultimately identify an alternative marker for the EPR effect, we investigated the correlation between 64Cu-liposome PET/CT (EPR effect) and 68Ga-RGD PET/CT (neoangiogenesis), 18F-FDG PET/CT (glycolysis), diffusion-weighted MRI (diffusivity) and interstitial fluid pressure in two experimental cancer models (CT26 and COLO 205).Results: 64Cu-liposome and 68Ga-RGD SUVmax displayed a significant moderate correlation, however, none of the other parameters evaluated displayed significant correlations. These results indicate that differences in neoangiogenesis may explain some EPR variability, however, as correlations were only moderate and not observed for SUVmean, 68Ga-RGD is probably insufficient to serve as a stand-alone surrogate marker for quantifying the EPR effect and stratifying patients.Keywords: EPR effect, liposome, positron emission tomography, neoangiogenesis
format article
author Børresen B
Hansen AE
Fliedner FP
Henriksen JR
Elema DR
Brandt-Larsen M
Kristensen LK
Kristensen AT
Andresen TL
Kjær A
author_facet Børresen B
Hansen AE
Fliedner FP
Henriksen JR
Elema DR
Brandt-Larsen M
Kristensen LK
Kristensen AT
Andresen TL
Kjær A
author_sort Børresen B
title Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG
title_short Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG
title_full Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG
title_fullStr Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect by 64Cu-Liposomes: In vivo Correlations with 68Ga-RGD, Fluid Pressure, Diffusivity and 18F-FDG
title_sort noninvasive molecular imaging of the enhanced permeability and retention effect by 64cu-liposomes: in vivo correlations with 68ga-rgd, fluid pressure, diffusivity and 18f-fdg
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/8f5d2a79b6c5463abbcc5f3b65bf21ef
work_keys_str_mv AT børresenb noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT hansenae noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT fliednerfp noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT henriksenjr noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT elemadr noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT brandtlarsenm noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT kristensenlk noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT kristensenat noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT andresentl noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
AT kjæra noninvasivemolecularimagingoftheenhancedpermeabilityandretentioneffectby64culiposomesinvivocorrelationswith68gargdfluidpressurediffusivityand18ffdg
_version_ 1718387459139567616