Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.

Adolescents take more risks than adults in the real world, but laboratory experiments do not consistently demonstrate this pattern. In the current study, we examine the possibility that age differences in decision making vary as a function of the nature of the task (e.g., how information about risk...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gail M Rosenbaum, Vinod Venkatraman, Laurence Steinberg, Jason M Chein
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8f6ea115f0394b2a9cca0799cbdb57bb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8f6ea115f0394b2a9cca0799cbdb57bb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8f6ea115f0394b2a9cca0799cbdb57bb2021-12-02T20:18:53ZDo adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0255102https://doaj.org/article/8f6ea115f0394b2a9cca0799cbdb57bb2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255102https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Adolescents take more risks than adults in the real world, but laboratory experiments do not consistently demonstrate this pattern. In the current study, we examine the possibility that age differences in decision making vary as a function of the nature of the task (e.g., how information about risk is learned) and contextual features of choices (e.g., the relative favorability of choice outcomes), due to age differences in psychological constructs and physiological processes related to choice (e.g., weighting of rare probabilities, sensitivity to expected value, sampling, pupil dilation). Adolescents and adults made the same 24 choices between risky and safe options twice: once based on descriptions of each option, and once based on experience gained from sampling the options repeatedly. We systematically varied contextual features of options, facilitating a fine-grained analysis of age differences in response to these features. Eye-tracking and experience-sampling measures allowed tests of age differences in predecisional processes. Results in adolescent and adult participants were similar in several respects, including mean risk-taking rates and eye-gaze patterns. However, adolescents' and adults' choice behavior and process measures varied as a function of decision context. Surprisingly, age differences were most pronounced in description, with only marginal differences in experience. Results suggest that probability weighting, expected-value sensitivity, experience sampling and pupil dilation patterns may change with age. Overall, results are consistent with the notion that adolescents are more prone than adults to take risks when faced with unlikely but costly negative outcomes, and broadly point to complex interactions between multiple psychological constructs that develop across adolescence.Gail M RosenbaumVinod VenkatramanLaurence SteinbergJason M CheinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0255102 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Gail M Rosenbaum
Vinod Venkatraman
Laurence Steinberg
Jason M Chein
Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
description Adolescents take more risks than adults in the real world, but laboratory experiments do not consistently demonstrate this pattern. In the current study, we examine the possibility that age differences in decision making vary as a function of the nature of the task (e.g., how information about risk is learned) and contextual features of choices (e.g., the relative favorability of choice outcomes), due to age differences in psychological constructs and physiological processes related to choice (e.g., weighting of rare probabilities, sensitivity to expected value, sampling, pupil dilation). Adolescents and adults made the same 24 choices between risky and safe options twice: once based on descriptions of each option, and once based on experience gained from sampling the options repeatedly. We systematically varied contextual features of options, facilitating a fine-grained analysis of age differences in response to these features. Eye-tracking and experience-sampling measures allowed tests of age differences in predecisional processes. Results in adolescent and adult participants were similar in several respects, including mean risk-taking rates and eye-gaze patterns. However, adolescents' and adults' choice behavior and process measures varied as a function of decision context. Surprisingly, age differences were most pronounced in description, with only marginal differences in experience. Results suggest that probability weighting, expected-value sensitivity, experience sampling and pupil dilation patterns may change with age. Overall, results are consistent with the notion that adolescents are more prone than adults to take risks when faced with unlikely but costly negative outcomes, and broadly point to complex interactions between multiple psychological constructs that develop across adolescence.
format article
author Gail M Rosenbaum
Vinod Venkatraman
Laurence Steinberg
Jason M Chein
author_facet Gail M Rosenbaum
Vinod Venkatraman
Laurence Steinberg
Jason M Chein
author_sort Gail M Rosenbaum
title Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
title_short Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
title_full Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
title_fullStr Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
title_full_unstemmed Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
title_sort do adolescents always take more risks than adults? a within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8f6ea115f0394b2a9cca0799cbdb57bb
work_keys_str_mv AT gailmrosenbaum doadolescentsalwaystakemorerisksthanadultsawithinsubjectsdevelopmentalstudyofcontexteffectsondecisionmakingandprocessing
AT vinodvenkatraman doadolescentsalwaystakemorerisksthanadultsawithinsubjectsdevelopmentalstudyofcontexteffectsondecisionmakingandprocessing
AT laurencesteinberg doadolescentsalwaystakemorerisksthanadultsawithinsubjectsdevelopmentalstudyofcontexteffectsondecisionmakingandprocessing
AT jasonmchein doadolescentsalwaystakemorerisksthanadultsawithinsubjectsdevelopmentalstudyofcontexteffectsondecisionmakingandprocessing
_version_ 1718374240260980736