Characterization of SSBP1-related optic atrophy and foveopathy

Abstract Dominant optic atrophy (DOA) is genetically heterogeneous and most commonly caused by mutations in OPA1. To distinguish between the classical OPA1-related and the recently identified SSBP1-related DOAs, the retina and fovea of 27 patients carrying the SSBP1 p.Arg38Gln variant were scrutiniz...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isabelle Meunier, Béatrice Bocquet, Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes, Vasily Smirnov, Carl Arndt, Marie Christine Picot, Hélène Dollfus, Majida Charif, Isabelle Audo, Hélèna Huguet, Xavier Zanlonghi, Guy Lenaers
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8fa606812b804c0a99225be600404957
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Dominant optic atrophy (DOA) is genetically heterogeneous and most commonly caused by mutations in OPA1. To distinguish between the classical OPA1-related and the recently identified SSBP1-related DOAs, the retina and fovea of 27 patients carrying the SSBP1 p.Arg38Gln variant were scrutinized using 20° × 20° macular cube and 30° and 55° field fundus autofluorescence photographs. Age of onset, visual acuity, retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thicknesses were recorded. Three SSBP1-patients were asymptomatic, 10 had isolated DOA, and 12 had a combined DOA plus foveopathy. The foveopathy, with a tiny defect of the ellipsoid and interdigitation lines, was similar in all patients, independent of age. There were no significant statistical differences in terms of visual acuity and SD-OCT measurements between patients with isolated DOA (mean visual acuity in decimals: 0.54 ± 0.41) and those with combined foveopathy (0.50 ± 0.23). Two patients over 50 years of age developed a progressive rod-cone dystrophy, leading to severe visual impairment. SSBP1-related DOA shares similarities with OPA1-related DOA with an incomplete penetrance and an early childhood visual impairment. Nevertheless, the presence of a congenital foveopathy with no impact on visual acuity is a major criterion to distinguish SSBP1 cases and orient the appropriate genetic analysis.