Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)

Carlos De las Cuevas,1,2 Wenceslao Peñate,3 Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,2,4 Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2,41Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 2Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; 3Department of Personality,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De las Cuevas C, Peñate W, Perestelo-Pérez L, Serrano-Aguilar P
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c2021-12-02T05:21:05ZShared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)1176-63281178-2021https://doaj.org/article/8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c2013-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/shared-decision-making-in-psychiatric-practice-and-the-primary-care-se-a13851https://doaj.org/toc/1176-6328https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Carlos De las Cuevas,1,2 Wenceslao Peñate,3 Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,2,4 Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2,41Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 2Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; 3Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 4Evaluation Unit, Canary Island Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, SpainBackground: To measure and compare the extent to which shared a decision making (SDM) process is implemented both in psychiatric outpatient clinical encounters and in the primary care setting from the patient’s perspective.Methods: A total of 1,477 patients recruited from the Canary Islands Health Service mental health and primary care departments were invited to complete the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) immediately after their consultation. MANCOVA, Student’s t-test, and Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship and differences between SDM-Q-9 scores in patient samples.Results: No differences were found in SDM-Q-9 total scores between the two patient samples, but there were relevant differences when item by item analysis was applied; differences were observed according to the different steps of the SDM process. SDM is present to a very limited extent in the routine psychiatric setting compared to primary care. Patients’ age, education, type of appointment, and treatment decision all play a specific role in predicting SDM.Conclusion: The study provides evidence that SDM is a complex process that needs to be analyzed according to its different steps. SDM patterns were different in the primary care and psychiatric outpatient care settings and reflect quite a different perspective of the decision making process.Keywords: primary care patients, psychiatric outpatients, SDM-Q-9, shared decision makingDe las Cuevas CPeñate WPerestelo-Pérez LSerrano-Aguilar PDove Medical PressarticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2013, Iss default, Pp 1045-1052 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
De las Cuevas C
Peñate W
Perestelo-Pérez L
Serrano-Aguilar P
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
description Carlos De las Cuevas,1,2 Wenceslao Peñate,3 Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,2,4 Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2,41Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 2Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; 3Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 4Evaluation Unit, Canary Island Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, SpainBackground: To measure and compare the extent to which shared a decision making (SDM) process is implemented both in psychiatric outpatient clinical encounters and in the primary care setting from the patient’s perspective.Methods: A total of 1,477 patients recruited from the Canary Islands Health Service mental health and primary care departments were invited to complete the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) immediately after their consultation. MANCOVA, Student’s t-test, and Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship and differences between SDM-Q-9 scores in patient samples.Results: No differences were found in SDM-Q-9 total scores between the two patient samples, but there were relevant differences when item by item analysis was applied; differences were observed according to the different steps of the SDM process. SDM is present to a very limited extent in the routine psychiatric setting compared to primary care. Patients’ age, education, type of appointment, and treatment decision all play a specific role in predicting SDM.Conclusion: The study provides evidence that SDM is a complex process that needs to be analyzed according to its different steps. SDM patterns were different in the primary care and psychiatric outpatient care settings and reflect quite a different perspective of the decision making process.Keywords: primary care patients, psychiatric outpatients, SDM-Q-9, shared decision making
format article
author De las Cuevas C
Peñate W
Perestelo-Pérez L
Serrano-Aguilar P
author_facet De las Cuevas C
Peñate W
Perestelo-Pérez L
Serrano-Aguilar P
author_sort De las Cuevas C
title Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
title_short Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
title_full Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
title_fullStr Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
title_sort shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (sdm-q-9)
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c
work_keys_str_mv AT delascuevasc shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9
AT peampntildeatew shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9
AT perestelopampeacuterezl shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9
AT serranoaguilarp shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9
_version_ 1718400428105793536