Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
Carlos De las Cuevas,1,2 Wenceslao Peñate,3 Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,2,4 Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2,41Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 2Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; 3Department of Personality,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c2021-12-02T05:21:05ZShared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)1176-63281178-2021https://doaj.org/article/8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c2013-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/shared-decision-making-in-psychiatric-practice-and-the-primary-care-se-a13851https://doaj.org/toc/1176-6328https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Carlos De las Cuevas,1,2 Wenceslao Peñate,3 Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,2,4 Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2,41Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 2Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; 3Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 4Evaluation Unit, Canary Island Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, SpainBackground: To measure and compare the extent to which shared a decision making (SDM) process is implemented both in psychiatric outpatient clinical encounters and in the primary care setting from the patient’s perspective.Methods: A total of 1,477 patients recruited from the Canary Islands Health Service mental health and primary care departments were invited to complete the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) immediately after their consultation. MANCOVA, Student’s t-test, and Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship and differences between SDM-Q-9 scores in patient samples.Results: No differences were found in SDM-Q-9 total scores between the two patient samples, but there were relevant differences when item by item analysis was applied; differences were observed according to the different steps of the SDM process. SDM is present to a very limited extent in the routine psychiatric setting compared to primary care. Patients’ age, education, type of appointment, and treatment decision all play a specific role in predicting SDM.Conclusion: The study provides evidence that SDM is a complex process that needs to be analyzed according to its different steps. SDM patterns were different in the primary care and psychiatric outpatient care settings and reflect quite a different perspective of the decision making process.Keywords: primary care patients, psychiatric outpatients, SDM-Q-9, shared decision makingDe las Cuevas CPeñate WPerestelo-Pérez LSerrano-Aguilar PDove Medical PressarticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2013, Iss default, Pp 1045-1052 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 |
spellingShingle |
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 De las Cuevas C Peñate W Perestelo-Pérez L Serrano-Aguilar P Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) |
description |
Carlos De las Cuevas,1,2 Wenceslao Peñate,3 Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez,2,4 Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2,41Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 2Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; 3Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; 4Evaluation Unit, Canary Island Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, SpainBackground: To measure and compare the extent to which shared a decision making (SDM) process is implemented both in psychiatric outpatient clinical encounters and in the primary care setting from the patient’s perspective.Methods: A total of 1,477 patients recruited from the Canary Islands Health Service mental health and primary care departments were invited to complete the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) immediately after their consultation. MANCOVA, Student’s t-test, and Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship and differences between SDM-Q-9 scores in patient samples.Results: No differences were found in SDM-Q-9 total scores between the two patient samples, but there were relevant differences when item by item analysis was applied; differences were observed according to the different steps of the SDM process. SDM is present to a very limited extent in the routine psychiatric setting compared to primary care. Patients’ age, education, type of appointment, and treatment decision all play a specific role in predicting SDM.Conclusion: The study provides evidence that SDM is a complex process that needs to be analyzed according to its different steps. SDM patterns were different in the primary care and psychiatric outpatient care settings and reflect quite a different perspective of the decision making process.Keywords: primary care patients, psychiatric outpatients, SDM-Q-9, shared decision making |
format |
article |
author |
De las Cuevas C Peñate W Perestelo-Pérez L Serrano-Aguilar P |
author_facet |
De las Cuevas C Peñate W Perestelo-Pérez L Serrano-Aguilar P |
author_sort |
De las Cuevas C |
title |
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) |
title_short |
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) |
title_full |
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) |
title_fullStr |
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) |
title_sort |
shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (sdm-q-9) |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8fb023659c404eba9b799876365bdd9c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT delascuevasc shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9 AT peampntildeatew shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9 AT perestelopampeacuterezl shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9 AT serranoaguilarp shareddecisionmakinginpsychiatricpracticeandtheprimarycaresettingisuniqueasmeasuredusinga9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnairesdmq9 |
_version_ |
1718400428105793536 |