Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism

This article questions the methodological conflation at work in Karen Barad’s agential realism. Barad’s immense appeal is first explained against the tense background of the nature/culture antagonism in the twentieth century. Then, by using some of the penetrating observations of a seventeen-century...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	René Rosfort
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DA EN NB SV
Publicado:	The Royal Danish Library 2012
Materias:	Social Sciences H
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8fb2f00481fa4f07bc6ef8fb527c4d54
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8fb2f00481fa4f07bc6ef8fb527c4d54
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8fb2f00481fa4f07bc6ef8fb527c4d542021-12-01T00:07:22ZDifferent Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism10.7146/kkf.v0i1-2.280662245-6937https://doaj.org/article/8fb2f00481fa4f07bc6ef8fb527c4d542012-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28066https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937This article questions the methodological conflation at work in Karen Barad’s agential realism. Barad’s immense appeal is first explained against the tense background of the nature/culture antagonism in the twentieth century. Then, by using some of the penetrating observations of a seventeen-century philosopher, Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, Barad’s “ethico-onto-epistem-ology” is examined and subsequently criticized for disregarding the persistence of subjectivity, dissolving the ambivalence of the bodily matter(s), and neglecting the need for concrete individuality in ethics.René RosfortThe Royal Danish LibraryarticleSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Iss 1-2 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DA EN NB SV
topic	Social Sciences H
spellingShingle	Social Sciences H René Rosfort Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism
description	This article questions the methodological conflation at work in Karen Barad’s agential realism. Barad’s immense appeal is first explained against the tense background of the nature/culture antagonism in the twentieth century. Then, by using some of the penetrating observations of a seventeen-century philosopher, Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, Barad’s “ethico-onto-epistem-ology” is examined and subsequently criticized for disregarding the persistence of subjectivity, dissolving the ambivalence of the bodily matter(s), and neglecting the need for concrete individuality in ethics.
format	article
author	René Rosfort
author_facet	René Rosfort
author_sort	René Rosfort
title	Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism
title_short	Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism
title_full	Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism
title_fullStr	Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism
title_full_unstemmed	Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism
title_sort	different kinds of matter(s) – subjectivity, body, and ethics in barad’s materialism
publisher	The Royal Danish Library
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/8fb2f00481fa4f07bc6ef8fb527c4d54
work_keys_str_mv	AT renerosfort differentkindsofmatterssubjectivitybodyandethicsinbaradsmaterialism
_version_	1718406093189677056

Different Kinds of Matter(s) – Subjectivity, Body, and Ethics in Barad’s Materialism

Ejemplares similares