EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW

The article analyzes the Brexit’s impact on the functioning of the European Economic Area (EEA). Brexit renewed interest to EEA format, as one of the options for future relations between the United Kingdom and the EU. But so close cooperation under the control of the Union did not meet the interests...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Liudmila O. Babynina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:	the european union european economic area brexit norway integration’ formats fisheries fta agreement. International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran520219299 https://doaj.org/article/8fb6a5216abe4806ad15049032f2bc16
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8fb6a5216abe4806ad15049032f2bc16
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8fb6a5216abe4806ad15049032f2bc162021-11-19T00:19:45ZEEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOWhttp://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran5202192992618-7914https://doaj.org/article/8fb6a5216abe4806ad15049032f2bc162021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/Babynina52021.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2618-7914The article analyzes the Brexit’s impact on the functioning of the European Economic Area (EEA). Brexit renewed interest to EEA format, as one of the options for future relations between the United Kingdom and the EU. But so close cooperation under the control of the Union did not meet the interests of Britain, which chose the greatest distance from EU rules and regulations. For nonEUEEAcountries (Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein) Brexit entailed a visible political and economic shake-up. First, the fact of the country’s exit from the EU and the tough position of the British government contributed to the growth of Eurosceptic rhetoric in the non-EU EEA countries. Secondly, in connection with the withdrawal of the UK from all structures of the European Union, these countries had a need to sign new trade and fisheries agreements. These processes were of the greatest impact for Norway, as the most significant player in the EEA, a non-EU member. Analyzing these processes, the author comes to the conclusion that Brexit did not have a significant impact on the functioning of the EEA, but increased interest in various external formats of integration. In addition, the domestic political discourse has become more acute regarding the possible revision of the format of relations with the EU, especially in Norway, which is largely due to national elections, but, according to the author, this will not lead to real changes in the existing parameters of relations.Liudmila O. BabyninaInstitute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciencesarticlethe european unioneuropean economic areabrexitnorwayintegration’ formatsfisheriesfta agreement.International relationsJZ2-6530RUНаучно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН, Vol 23, Iss 5, Pp 92-99 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	the european union european economic area brexit norway integration’ formats fisheries fta agreement. International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	the european union european economic area brexit norway integration’ formats fisheries fta agreement. International relations JZ2-6530 Liudmila O. Babynina EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW
description	The article analyzes the Brexit’s impact on the functioning of the European Economic Area (EEA). Brexit renewed interest to EEA format, as one of the options for future relations between the United Kingdom and the EU. But so close cooperation under the control of the Union did not meet the interests of Britain, which chose the greatest distance from EU rules and regulations. For nonEUEEAcountries (Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein) Brexit entailed a visible political and economic shake-up. First, the fact of the country’s exit from the EU and the tough position of the British government contributed to the growth of Eurosceptic rhetoric in the non-EU EEA countries. Secondly, in connection with the withdrawal of the UK from all structures of the European Union, these countries had a need to sign new trade and fisheries agreements. These processes were of the greatest impact for Norway, as the most significant player in the EEA, a non-EU member. Analyzing these processes, the author comes to the conclusion that Brexit did not have a significant impact on the functioning of the EEA, but increased interest in various external formats of integration. In addition, the domestic political discourse has become more acute regarding the possible revision of the format of relations with the EU, especially in Norway, which is largely due to national elections, but, according to the author, this will not lead to real changes in the existing parameters of relations.
format	article
author	Liudmila O. Babynina
author_facet	Liudmila O. Babynina
author_sort	Liudmila O. Babynina
title	EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW
title_short	EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW
title_full	EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW
title_fullStr	EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW
title_full_unstemmed	EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW
title_sort	eea in the brexit’ shadow
publisher	Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences
publishDate	2021
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran520219299 https://doaj.org/article/8fb6a5216abe4806ad15049032f2bc16
work_keys_str_mv	AT liudmilaobabynina eeainthebrexitshadow
_version_	1718420623713107968

EEA IN THE BREXIT’ SHADOW

Ejemplares similares