A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups

Background: Currently there are various issues that exist in the medical institutions in China as a result of the price-setting in DRGs, which include the fact that medical institutions tend to choose patients and that the payment standard for complex cases cannot reasonably compensate the cost.Obje...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jinli Duan, Zhibin Lin, Feng Jiao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8fcac02d98464fba865859b3dc42b92d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8fcac02d98464fba865859b3dc42b92d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8fcac02d98464fba865859b3dc42b92d2021-12-01T16:17:58ZA Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups2296-256510.3389/fpubh.2021.737788https://doaj.org/article/8fcac02d98464fba865859b3dc42b92d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.737788/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565Background: Currently there are various issues that exist in the medical institutions in China as a result of the price-setting in DRGs, which include the fact that medical institutions tend to choose patients and that the payment standard for complex cases cannot reasonably compensate the cost.Objective: The main objective is to prevent adverse selection problems in the operations of a diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) system with the game pricing model for scientific and reasonable pricing.Methods: The study proposes an improved bargaining game model over three stages, with the government and patients forming an alliance. The first stage assumes the alliance is the price maker in the Stackelberg game to maximize social welfare. Medical institutions are a price taker and decide the level of quality of medical service to maximize their revenue. A Stackelberg equilibrium solution is obtained. The second stage assumes medical institutions dominate the Stackelberg game and set an optimal service quality for maximizing their revenues. The alliance as the price taker decides the price to maximize the social welfare. Another Stackelberg equilibrium solution is achieved. The final stage establishes a Rubinstein bargaining game model to combine the Stackelberg equilibrium solutions in the first and second stage. A new equilibrium between the alliance and medical institutions is established.Results: The results show that if the price elasticity of demand increases, the ratio of cost compensation on medical institutions will increase, and the equilibrium price will increase. The equilibrium price is associated with the coefficient of patients' quality preference. The absolute risk aversion coefficient of patients affects government compensation and total social welfare.Conclusion: In a DRGs system, considering the demand elasticity and the quality preference of patients, medical service pricing can prevent an adverse selection problem. In the future, we plan to generalize these models to DRGs pricing systems with the effects of competition of medical institutions. In addition, we suggest considering the differential compensation for general hospitals and community hospitals in a DRGs system, in order to promote the goal of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment.Jinli DuanZhibin LinFeng JiaoFrontiers Media S.A.articlebargaining modelpricinggovernment compensationmedical servicepatientqualityPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENFrontiers in Public Health, Vol 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bargaining model
pricing
government compensation
medical service
patient
quality
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle bargaining model
pricing
government compensation
medical service
patient
quality
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Jinli Duan
Zhibin Lin
Feng Jiao
A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups
description Background: Currently there are various issues that exist in the medical institutions in China as a result of the price-setting in DRGs, which include the fact that medical institutions tend to choose patients and that the payment standard for complex cases cannot reasonably compensate the cost.Objective: The main objective is to prevent adverse selection problems in the operations of a diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) system with the game pricing model for scientific and reasonable pricing.Methods: The study proposes an improved bargaining game model over three stages, with the government and patients forming an alliance. The first stage assumes the alliance is the price maker in the Stackelberg game to maximize social welfare. Medical institutions are a price taker and decide the level of quality of medical service to maximize their revenue. A Stackelberg equilibrium solution is obtained. The second stage assumes medical institutions dominate the Stackelberg game and set an optimal service quality for maximizing their revenues. The alliance as the price taker decides the price to maximize the social welfare. Another Stackelberg equilibrium solution is achieved. The final stage establishes a Rubinstein bargaining game model to combine the Stackelberg equilibrium solutions in the first and second stage. A new equilibrium between the alliance and medical institutions is established.Results: The results show that if the price elasticity of demand increases, the ratio of cost compensation on medical institutions will increase, and the equilibrium price will increase. The equilibrium price is associated with the coefficient of patients' quality preference. The absolute risk aversion coefficient of patients affects government compensation and total social welfare.Conclusion: In a DRGs system, considering the demand elasticity and the quality preference of patients, medical service pricing can prevent an adverse selection problem. In the future, we plan to generalize these models to DRGs pricing systems with the effects of competition of medical institutions. In addition, we suggest considering the differential compensation for general hospitals and community hospitals in a DRGs system, in order to promote the goal of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment.
format article
author Jinli Duan
Zhibin Lin
Feng Jiao
author_facet Jinli Duan
Zhibin Lin
Feng Jiao
author_sort Jinli Duan
title A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups
title_short A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups
title_full A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups
title_fullStr A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups
title_full_unstemmed A Game Model for Medical Service Pricing Based on the Diagnosis Related Groups
title_sort game model for medical service pricing based on the diagnosis related groups
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8fcac02d98464fba865859b3dc42b92d
work_keys_str_mv AT jinliduan agamemodelformedicalservicepricingbasedonthediagnosisrelatedgroups
AT zhibinlin agamemodelformedicalservicepricingbasedonthediagnosisrelatedgroups
AT fengjiao agamemodelformedicalservicepricingbasedonthediagnosisrelatedgroups
AT jinliduan gamemodelformedicalservicepricingbasedonthediagnosisrelatedgroups
AT zhibinlin gamemodelformedicalservicepricingbasedonthediagnosisrelatedgroups
AT fengjiao gamemodelformedicalservicepricingbasedonthediagnosisrelatedgroups
_version_ 1718404828252602368