Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition

Saul Kripke’s (1982) sceptical take on Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox challenges us to find facts that can justify one interpretation of a symbol’s past use over another. While Ruth Millikan (1990) has answered this challenge by appealing to biological purposes, her answer has been criticize...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jean-Charles Pelland
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
IT
Publicado: Rosenberg & Sellier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de32021-12-02T10:34:02ZGrounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition10.13128/pam-80372280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de32020-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/8037https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Saul Kripke’s (1982) sceptical take on Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox challenges us to find facts that can justify one interpretation of a symbol’s past use over another. While Ruth Millikan (1990) has answered this challenge by appealing to biological purposes, her answer has been criticized for failing to account for the normativity of rules like addition, which require explicit representations. In this paper, I offer a defense of Millikan. I claim that we can explain how we build intentions to add from the content of core cognition modules like the approximate number system, and argue that Millikan’s answer is better equipped to explain the origins of rules than communitarian approaches like that endorsed by Kusch (2006). I then explore the worth of pluralism about rules and try to find common ground between expressed and unexpressed rules in terms of expectations of how the world is supposed to behave. Jean-Charles PellandRosenberg & SellierarticleKripkensteinbiosemanticsnormativitybiological functionscore cognitionnumerical cognitionAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 17 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
IT
topic Kripkenstein
biosemantics
normativity
biological functions
core cognition
numerical cognition
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
spellingShingle Kripkenstein
biosemantics
normativity
biological functions
core cognition
numerical cognition
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
Jean-Charles Pelland
Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
description Saul Kripke’s (1982) sceptical take on Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox challenges us to find facts that can justify one interpretation of a symbol’s past use over another. While Ruth Millikan (1990) has answered this challenge by appealing to biological purposes, her answer has been criticized for failing to account for the normativity of rules like addition, which require explicit representations. In this paper, I offer a defense of Millikan. I claim that we can explain how we build intentions to add from the content of core cognition modules like the approximate number system, and argue that Millikan’s answer is better equipped to explain the origins of rules than communitarian approaches like that endorsed by Kusch (2006). I then explore the worth of pluralism about rules and try to find common ground between expressed and unexpressed rules in terms of expectations of how the world is supposed to behave.
format article
author Jean-Charles Pelland
author_facet Jean-Charles Pelland
author_sort Jean-Charles Pelland
title Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
title_short Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
title_full Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
title_fullStr Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
title_full_unstemmed Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
title_sort grounding normativity in biology: the unexpressed rules of core cognition
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de3
work_keys_str_mv AT jeancharlespelland groundingnormativityinbiologytheunexpressedrulesofcorecognition
_version_ 1718397068939100160