Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
Saul Kripke’s (1982) sceptical take on Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox challenges us to find facts that can justify one interpretation of a symbol’s past use over another. While Ruth Millikan (1990) has answered this challenge by appealing to biological purposes, her answer has been criticize...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Jean-Charles Pelland |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Slurs: At-issueness and Semantic Normativity
por: Simone Carrus
Publicado: (2017) -
Normative Experience: Deontic Noema and Deontic Noesis
por: Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
Publicado: (2017) -
Norms from Nature. Etiological Functions as Normative Standards
por: Carlo Burelli
Publicado: (2020) -
Care, Social Practices and Normativity. Inner Struggle versus Panglossian Rule-Following
por: Alexander Albert Jeuk
Publicado: (2020) -
Animal Normativity
por: Laura Danón
Publicado: (2020)