Grounding Normativity in Biology: The Unexpressed Rules of Core Cognition
Saul Kripke’s (1982) sceptical take on Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox challenges us to find facts that can justify one interpretation of a symbol’s past use over another. While Ruth Millikan (1990) has answered this challenge by appealing to biological purposes, her answer has been criticize...
Enregistré dans:
Auteur principal: | Jean-Charles Pelland |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN FR IT |
Publié: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2020
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/8fcd3e44ad7247ad9d15aa61fc1c0de3 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Slurs: At-issueness and Semantic Normativity
par: Simone Carrus
Publié: (2017) -
Normative Experience: Deontic Noema and Deontic Noesis
par: Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
Publié: (2017) -
Norms from Nature. Etiological Functions as Normative Standards
par: Carlo Burelli
Publié: (2020) -
Care, Social Practices and Normativity. Inner Struggle versus Panglossian Rule-Following
par: Alexander Albert Jeuk
Publié: (2020) -
Animal Normativity
par: Laura Danón
Publié: (2020)