Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma

This paper looks at the use of the Serbian terms "kulturna baština" and "kulturno nasleđe" (both of which are translated as "cultural heritage") to refer to elements of culture preserved from the past and considered valuable enough to be preserved as part of the museali...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Ljiljana Gavrilović
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR SR
Publicado:	University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:	Anthropology GN1-890
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/901a64090e6347b1bca3cf925cf9ba5b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:901a64090e6347b1bca3cf925cf9ba5b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:901a64090e6347b1bca3cf925cf9ba5b2021-12-02T03:52:55ZNomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/901a64090e6347b1bca3cf925cf9ba5b2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/156https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801This paper looks at the use of the Serbian terms "kulturna baština" and "kulturno nasleđe" (both of which are translated as "cultural heritage") to refer to elements of culture preserved from the past and considered valuable enough to be preserved as part of the musealization of reality in its various forms. It offers an analysis of how, through the (re)introduction of the old/new term baština, patriarchy and essentialism – two elements of non-material cultural heritage that are ostensibly undesirable and not to be retained since they are contrary to international law – are being reinstated in the sphere of culture by bureaucratic means.Ljiljana GavrilovićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 5, Iss 2 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR SR
topic	Anthropology GN1-890
spellingShingle	Anthropology GN1-890 Ljiljana Gavrilović Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma
description	This paper looks at the use of the Serbian terms "kulturna baština" and "kulturno nasleđe" (both of which are translated as "cultural heritage") to refer to elements of culture preserved from the past and considered valuable enough to be preserved as part of the musealization of reality in its various forms. It offers an analysis of how, through the (re)introduction of the old/new term baština, patriarchy and essentialism – two elements of non-material cultural heritage that are ostensibly undesirable and not to be retained since they are contrary to international law – are being reinstated in the sphere of culture by bureaucratic means.
format	article
author	Ljiljana Gavrilović
author_facet	Ljiljana Gavrilović
author_sort	Ljiljana Gavrilović
title	Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma
title_short	Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma
title_full	Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma
title_fullStr	Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma
title_full_unstemmed	Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma
title_sort	nomen est omen: heritage – baština or nasleđe – a (not merely) terminological dilemma
publisher	University of Belgrade
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/901a64090e6347b1bca3cf925cf9ba5b
work_keys_str_mv	AT ljiljanagavrilovic nomenestomenheritagebastinaornasleđeanotmerelyterminologicaldilemma
_version_	1718401565979574272

Nomen Est Omen: Heritage – Baština or Nasleđe – A (Not Merely) Terminological Dilemma

Ejemplares similares