Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas

<span class="abs_content">Sometimes governments choose to include ordinary people at some stage of the policy making process by setting up temporary and structured arenas where participants are put in a posi-tion whereby they can deliberate on public issues and make decisions or prop...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Luigi Bobbio
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Coordinamento SIBA 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/905cee1a76384018bbc9bc9e32a73e79
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:905cee1a76384018bbc9bc9e32a73e79
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:905cee1a76384018bbc9bc9e32a73e792021-11-21T15:11:39ZNeither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas1972-76232035-660910.1285/i20356609v10i2p613https://doaj.org/article/905cee1a76384018bbc9bc9e32a73e792017-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/17739https://doaj.org/toc/1972-7623https://doaj.org/toc/2035-6609<span class="abs_content">Sometimes governments choose to include ordinary people at some stage of the policy making process by setting up temporary and structured arenas where participants are put in a posi-tion whereby they can deliberate on public issues and make decisions or propose suggestions. Do such deliberative arenas depoliticize democracy, as a vast amount of literature suggests? This article is aimed at challenging this point of view, by giving a close look at two cases of democratic experi-mentation. An analysis of what actually happens in those venues shows that such arenas appear to display, at the same time, both unpolitical and political features. On one hand, they are non-majoritarian bodies, just like other depoliticized venues, but on the other, they deal with conflicts and discuss goals, and thus perform typical political activities. It is possible to say that they are nei-ther completely political nor completely unpolitical. They instead have a hybrid nature that can coun-teract the continuous fluctuations between (hyper)politicization and (hyper)depoliticization that are so typical of our times. This implies a revision of the standard theory of politicization/depoliticization that does not consider the possibility of gray areas. Overcoming the rigid opposition between the two terms of the dichotomy can lead to the discovery of some interesting possibilities that often tend to be overlooked.</span><br />Luigi BobbioCoordinamento SIBAarticledeliberative arenasdeliberative democracydepoliticizationminipublicspublic de-batePolitical science (General)JA1-92ENPartecipazione e Conflitto, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 613-635 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic deliberative arenas
deliberative democracy
depoliticization
minipublics
public de-bate
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle deliberative arenas
deliberative democracy
depoliticization
minipublics
public de-bate
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Luigi Bobbio
Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas
description <span class="abs_content">Sometimes governments choose to include ordinary people at some stage of the policy making process by setting up temporary and structured arenas where participants are put in a posi-tion whereby they can deliberate on public issues and make decisions or propose suggestions. Do such deliberative arenas depoliticize democracy, as a vast amount of literature suggests? This article is aimed at challenging this point of view, by giving a close look at two cases of democratic experi-mentation. An analysis of what actually happens in those venues shows that such arenas appear to display, at the same time, both unpolitical and political features. On one hand, they are non-majoritarian bodies, just like other depoliticized venues, but on the other, they deal with conflicts and discuss goals, and thus perform typical political activities. It is possible to say that they are nei-ther completely political nor completely unpolitical. They instead have a hybrid nature that can coun-teract the continuous fluctuations between (hyper)politicization and (hyper)depoliticization that are so typical of our times. This implies a revision of the standard theory of politicization/depoliticization that does not consider the possibility of gray areas. Overcoming the rigid opposition between the two terms of the dichotomy can lead to the discovery of some interesting possibilities that often tend to be overlooked.</span><br />
format article
author Luigi Bobbio
author_facet Luigi Bobbio
author_sort Luigi Bobbio
title Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas
title_short Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas
title_full Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas
title_fullStr Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas
title_full_unstemmed Neither Completely Political nor Completely Unpolitical. The Third Way of Deliberative Arenas
title_sort neither completely political nor completely unpolitical. the third way of deliberative arenas
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/905cee1a76384018bbc9bc9e32a73e79
work_keys_str_mv AT luigibobbio neithercompletelypoliticalnorcompletelyunpoliticalthethirdwayofdeliberativearenas
_version_ 1718418777321766912