Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)

Parents, blood and affined relatives and the tribal memory of Rus province’s nobility in the 17th – first half of the 18th centuries (in the light of the dietines’ acts of deductionis nobilitatis) The nobles, who were accused for the ignoble origin, had to go through the special procedure of pro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ołeksij Winnyczenko
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
RU
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/90604616bf1a40b0bdafafdcd88ccf15
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:90604616bf1a40b0bdafafdcd88ccf15
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:90604616bf1a40b0bdafafdcd88ccf152021-11-27T12:56:26ZRodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)10.12797/KPK.06.2014.06.032081-9463https://doaj.org/article/90604616bf1a40b0bdafafdcd88ccf152021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/kpk/article/view/1961https://doaj.org/toc/2081-9463 Parents, blood and affined relatives and the tribal memory of Rus province’s nobility in the 17th – first half of the 18th centuries (in the light of the dietines’ acts of deductionis nobilitatis) The nobles, who were accused for the ignoble origin, had to go through the special procedure of proofing their nobility (deductionis nobilitatis) in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. They were required, according to the decision of the Diet in 1601, to submit a number of relatives-witnesses and documentary evidence during the annual deputy dietines and in front of the noble corporations’ representatives of that province from where the accused or his ancestors came from. A number of attestations, that were concluded in the 17th century as a result of successful proofs of nobility during dietines in Wisznia and Halicz, were known from the territories of Rus province. The understanding of family’s past, the former and current members of relatives of some privileged class, whose ancestral’s memory was stimulated by the threat of losing their social status, were reflected in these acts. The accusation of being ignoble had to push nobleman to restore his memory of the family, to reconstruct these ideas in a system of knowledge and to supplement them by the memory of his relatives and by documentary evidences. In the light of dietines’ attestations, the knowledge of ancestors and relatives, which differ in each case, was generally limited to three or four generations, usually no distant then grandfather’s generation (maximum great-grandfather). The memory of their ancestors from the female side was less profound (often no distant then grandfather), while from male side, due to property (hereditary) interest, it was supplemented with information from documentary records. A certain number of blood relatives, usually two or three dozen people and the representatives of older generations as well as coevals (cousins or second cousin and uncles) were known from the lateral branches. The relationship with them, in a mind of nobleman, was lined by the belonging to the descendants of any of the blood and affined relatives of his own ancestors. Preferably, the knowledge concerns men due to the patriarchal nature of noble families and perception of family as male (knight) corporation. Ołeksij WinnyczenkoKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleRus province in the 17th centurydeputy dietinesdietines in Wiszniadietines in Halicznobilityproof of nobility (deductionis nobilitatis)History of Eastern EuropeDJK1-77Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropologyGN301-674ENPLRUKrakowskie Pismo Kresowe, Vol 6, Iss 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
RU
topic Rus province in the 17th century
deputy dietines
dietines in Wisznia
dietines in Halicz
nobility
proof of nobility (deductionis nobilitatis)
History of Eastern Europe
DJK1-77
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
spellingShingle Rus province in the 17th century
deputy dietines
dietines in Wisznia
dietines in Halicz
nobility
proof of nobility (deductionis nobilitatis)
History of Eastern Europe
DJK1-77
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
Ołeksij Winnyczenko
Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
description Parents, blood and affined relatives and the tribal memory of Rus province’s nobility in the 17th – first half of the 18th centuries (in the light of the dietines’ acts of deductionis nobilitatis) The nobles, who were accused for the ignoble origin, had to go through the special procedure of proofing their nobility (deductionis nobilitatis) in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. They were required, according to the decision of the Diet in 1601, to submit a number of relatives-witnesses and documentary evidence during the annual deputy dietines and in front of the noble corporations’ representatives of that province from where the accused or his ancestors came from. A number of attestations, that were concluded in the 17th century as a result of successful proofs of nobility during dietines in Wisznia and Halicz, were known from the territories of Rus province. The understanding of family’s past, the former and current members of relatives of some privileged class, whose ancestral’s memory was stimulated by the threat of losing their social status, were reflected in these acts. The accusation of being ignoble had to push nobleman to restore his memory of the family, to reconstruct these ideas in a system of knowledge and to supplement them by the memory of his relatives and by documentary evidences. In the light of dietines’ attestations, the knowledge of ancestors and relatives, which differ in each case, was generally limited to three or four generations, usually no distant then grandfather’s generation (maximum great-grandfather). The memory of their ancestors from the female side was less profound (often no distant then grandfather), while from male side, due to property (hereditary) interest, it was supplemented with information from documentary records. A certain number of blood relatives, usually two or three dozen people and the representatives of older generations as well as coevals (cousins or second cousin and uncles) were known from the lateral branches. The relationship with them, in a mind of nobleman, was lined by the belonging to the descendants of any of the blood and affined relatives of his own ancestors. Preferably, the knowledge concerns men due to the patriarchal nature of noble families and perception of family as male (knight) corporation.
format article
author Ołeksij Winnyczenko
author_facet Ołeksij Winnyczenko
author_sort Ołeksij Winnyczenko
title Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
title_short Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
title_full Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
title_fullStr Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
title_full_unstemmed Rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w XVII wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
title_sort rodzice, krewni i powinowaci a pamięć rodowa szlachty województwa ruskiego w xvii wieku (w świetle akt sejmikowych deductionis nobilitatis)
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/90604616bf1a40b0bdafafdcd88ccf15
work_keys_str_mv AT ołeksijwinnyczenko rodzicekrewniipowinowaciapamiecrodowaszlachtywojewodztwaruskiegowxviiwiekuwswietleaktsejmikowychdeductionisnobilitatis
_version_ 1718408937243410432