Comparative Analysis of Triple Hemostatic Open Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Traditional Open Hemorrhoidectomy
Background: Traditional open hemorrhoidectomy is the most commonly performed operation for the third or fourth degree hemorrhoidsin the developing world, despite considerable postoperative pain and bleeding complications. This modification is anattempt to reduce these complications and compare the o...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/906938e4cd084ea682027f48c64e8f5d |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Background: Traditional open hemorrhoidectomy is the most commonly performed operation for the third or fourth degree hemorrhoidsin the developing world, despite considerable postoperative pain and bleeding complications. This modification is anattempt to reduce these complications and compare the outcome of both methods.Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted in phase I, at Fatima hospital at Baqai Medical University, from March2009 to August 2011. It was followed by a descriptive case-series in phase II, conducted at different hospitals from September 2011to August 2017. The inclusion criteria were patients of both genders and all age groups, with third or fourth degree hemorrhoidsrequiring surgery. The exclusion criteria were patients in between blocks (operated by other surgeons), patients with complicatedhemorrhoids, closed hemorrhoidectomy cases, cases operated by residents, and cases lost to follow-up. In phase I, a total of 182patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to group A or B undergoing triple hemostatic hemorrhoidectomy and traditionalopen hemorrhoidectomy, respectively; 231 patients were included in phase II (group C) undergoing modified hemorrhoidectomy.The analyzed variables were operative blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, time to pain-free defecation, andper-operative or postoperative complications.Results: There was significantly more operative blood loss in group B patients. Pain perception was significantly high in group Bpatients at eight and 24 hours, as well as eighth, 15th, and 30th days. Group B patients also had longer duration of operation andmore prolonged pain-free defecation. Both, intra-operative and post-operative complications were higher among the group B. Theoutcome of phase II (group C) was similar to those of group A.Conclusions: In a limited resource setting, triple hemostatic open hemorrhoidectomy offers potential advantages of less operativeblood loss, shorter duration of operation, shortened hospital stay, shorter time to pain free defecation, and less postoperative painand other complications. |
|---|