Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features

Abstract As groups are increasingly taking over individual experts in many tasks, it is ever more important to understand the determinants of group success. In this paper, we study the patterns of group success in Escape The Room, a physical adventure game in which a group is tasked with escaping a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin Saveski, Edmond Awad, Iyad Rahwan, Manuel Cebrian
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/90740de6a5a4461b940d63f1d79ae8e0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:90740de6a5a4461b940d63f1d79ae8e0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:90740de6a5a4461b940d63f1d79ae8e02021-12-02T14:06:11ZAlgorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features10.1038/s41598-021-81145-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/90740de6a5a4461b940d63f1d79ae8e02021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81145-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract As groups are increasingly taking over individual experts in many tasks, it is ever more important to understand the determinants of group success. In this paper, we study the patterns of group success in Escape The Room, a physical adventure game in which a group is tasked with escaping a maze by collectively solving a series of puzzles. We investigate (1) the characteristics of successful groups, and (2) how accurately humans and machines can spot them from a group photo. The relationship between these two questions is based on the hypothesis that the characteristics of successful groups are encoded by features that can be spotted in their photo. We analyze >43K group photos (one photo per group) taken after groups have completed the game—from which all explicit performance-signaling information has been removed. First, we find that groups that are larger, older and more gender but less age diverse are significantly more likely to escape. Second, we compare humans and off-the-shelf machine learning algorithms at predicting whether a group escaped or not based on the completion photo. We find that individual guesses by humans achieve 58.3% accuracy, better than random, but worse than machines which display 71.6% accuracy. When humans are trained to guess by observing only four labeled photos, their accuracy increases to 64%. However, training humans on more labeled examples (eight or twelve) leads to a slight, but statistically insignificant improvement in accuracy (67.4%). Humans in the best training condition perform on par with two, but worse than three out of the five machine learning algorithms we evaluated. Our work illustrates the potentials and the limitations of machine learning systems in evaluating group performance and identifying success factors based on sparse visual cues.Martin SaveskiEdmond AwadIyad RahwanManuel CebrianNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Martin Saveski
Edmond Awad
Iyad Rahwan
Manuel Cebrian
Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
description Abstract As groups are increasingly taking over individual experts in many tasks, it is ever more important to understand the determinants of group success. In this paper, we study the patterns of group success in Escape The Room, a physical adventure game in which a group is tasked with escaping a maze by collectively solving a series of puzzles. We investigate (1) the characteristics of successful groups, and (2) how accurately humans and machines can spot them from a group photo. The relationship between these two questions is based on the hypothesis that the characteristics of successful groups are encoded by features that can be spotted in their photo. We analyze >43K group photos (one photo per group) taken after groups have completed the game—from which all explicit performance-signaling information has been removed. First, we find that groups that are larger, older and more gender but less age diverse are significantly more likely to escape. Second, we compare humans and off-the-shelf machine learning algorithms at predicting whether a group escaped or not based on the completion photo. We find that individual guesses by humans achieve 58.3% accuracy, better than random, but worse than machines which display 71.6% accuracy. When humans are trained to guess by observing only four labeled photos, their accuracy increases to 64%. However, training humans on more labeled examples (eight or twelve) leads to a slight, but statistically insignificant improvement in accuracy (67.4%). Humans in the best training condition perform on par with two, but worse than three out of the five machine learning algorithms we evaluated. Our work illustrates the potentials and the limitations of machine learning systems in evaluating group performance and identifying success factors based on sparse visual cues.
format article
author Martin Saveski
Edmond Awad
Iyad Rahwan
Manuel Cebrian
author_facet Martin Saveski
Edmond Awad
Iyad Rahwan
Manuel Cebrian
author_sort Martin Saveski
title Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
title_short Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
title_full Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
title_fullStr Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
title_sort algorithmic and human prediction of success in human collaboration from visual features
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/90740de6a5a4461b940d63f1d79ae8e0
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsaveski algorithmicandhumanpredictionofsuccessinhumancollaborationfromvisualfeatures
AT edmondawad algorithmicandhumanpredictionofsuccessinhumancollaborationfromvisualfeatures
AT iyadrahwan algorithmicandhumanpredictionofsuccessinhumancollaborationfromvisualfeatures
AT manuelcebrian algorithmicandhumanpredictionofsuccessinhumancollaborationfromvisualfeatures
_version_ 1718392034552709120