Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

AIM: To compare perioperative parameters of one-handed rotational phacoemulsification technique (one-handed phaco-roll) with each of other two techniques, “Divide et Conquer” and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) METHODS: In this retrospective and comparative cohort study, eyes wit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samuele Gigliola, Giancarlo Sborgia, Alfredo Niro, Carmela Palmisano, Pasquale Puzo, Gianluigi Giuliani, Luigi Sborgia, Dario Sisto, Valentina Pastore, Claudio Furino, Rossella Donghia, Alessandra Sborgia, Francesco Boscia, Giovanni Alessio
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9075c5a4401d484c9543bf25ba97f77c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9075c5a4401d484c9543bf25ba97f77c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9075c5a4401d484c9543bf25ba97f77c2021-11-26T04:02:12ZComparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery2222-39592227-489810.18240/ijo.2021.12.09https://doaj.org/article/9075c5a4401d484c9543bf25ba97f77c2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ies.ijo.cn/en_publish/2021/12/20211209.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2222-3959https://doaj.org/toc/2227-4898AIM: To compare perioperative parameters of one-handed rotational phacoemulsification technique (one-handed phaco-roll) with each of other two techniques, “Divide et Conquer” and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) METHODS: In this retrospective and comparative cohort study, eyes with uncomplicated cataract (nuclear density grade 2 to 3) treated routinely with one-handed phaco-roll (n=23; Group 1) or “Divide et Conquer” (n=23; Group 2) or FLACS (n=23; Group 3) were enrolled. Intraoperative parameters including effective phaco-time (EPt), ultrasound time (USt), aspiration time, surgical time, phacoemulsification (phaco)-power, balanced salt solution (BSS) use, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) were recorded and compared. Clinical outcomes including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial cell loss (ECL), central corneal thickness (CCT) and central macular thickness (CMT), were assessed and compared pre-operatively and at 1mo after surgery. RESULTS: Aspiration and surgical time, and BSS used were lower in Group 1 (P<0.01) than other groups. EPt, phaco-power and CDE were lower in Group 1 (P<0.05) than Group 2 but not significantly different from Group 3. In Group 1, USt was lower (P<0.05) than Group 2 but higher (P<0.05) than Group 3. BCVA improved in all groups without significant difference between Group 1 and the other ones. No significant differences regarding all post-operative morphologic outcomes (ECD, ECL, CCT, CMT) were reported. No clinical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: One-handed phaco-roll seems to be less time-consuming than “Divide et Conquer” and FLACS and less energy-consuming than “Divide et Conquer”. Furthermore, one-handed phaco-roll seems to have an equal safety profile compared to the other two techniques.Samuele GigliolaGiancarlo SborgiaAlfredo NiroCarmela PalmisanoPasquale PuzoGianluigi GiulianiLuigi SborgiaDario SistoValentina PastoreClaudio FurinoRossella DonghiaAlessandra SborgiaFrancesco BosciaGiovanni AlessioPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)articlecataract surgeryphaco-rollingone-handed phacoemulsificationdivide et conquerfemtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeryOphthalmologyRE1-994ENInternational Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol 14, Iss 12, Pp 1868-1875 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cataract surgery
phaco-rolling
one-handed phacoemulsification
divide et conquer
femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle cataract surgery
phaco-rolling
one-handed phacoemulsification
divide et conquer
femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Samuele Gigliola
Giancarlo Sborgia
Alfredo Niro
Carmela Palmisano
Pasquale Puzo
Gianluigi Giuliani
Luigi Sborgia
Dario Sisto
Valentina Pastore
Claudio Furino
Rossella Donghia
Alessandra Sborgia
Francesco Boscia
Giovanni Alessio
Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
description AIM: To compare perioperative parameters of one-handed rotational phacoemulsification technique (one-handed phaco-roll) with each of other two techniques, “Divide et Conquer” and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) METHODS: In this retrospective and comparative cohort study, eyes with uncomplicated cataract (nuclear density grade 2 to 3) treated routinely with one-handed phaco-roll (n=23; Group 1) or “Divide et Conquer” (n=23; Group 2) or FLACS (n=23; Group 3) were enrolled. Intraoperative parameters including effective phaco-time (EPt), ultrasound time (USt), aspiration time, surgical time, phacoemulsification (phaco)-power, balanced salt solution (BSS) use, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) were recorded and compared. Clinical outcomes including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial cell loss (ECL), central corneal thickness (CCT) and central macular thickness (CMT), were assessed and compared pre-operatively and at 1mo after surgery. RESULTS: Aspiration and surgical time, and BSS used were lower in Group 1 (P<0.01) than other groups. EPt, phaco-power and CDE were lower in Group 1 (P<0.05) than Group 2 but not significantly different from Group 3. In Group 1, USt was lower (P<0.05) than Group 2 but higher (P<0.05) than Group 3. BCVA improved in all groups without significant difference between Group 1 and the other ones. No significant differences regarding all post-operative morphologic outcomes (ECD, ECL, CCT, CMT) were reported. No clinical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: One-handed phaco-roll seems to be less time-consuming than “Divide et Conquer” and FLACS and less energy-consuming than “Divide et Conquer”. Furthermore, one-handed phaco-roll seems to have an equal safety profile compared to the other two techniques.
format article
author Samuele Gigliola
Giancarlo Sborgia
Alfredo Niro
Carmela Palmisano
Pasquale Puzo
Gianluigi Giuliani
Luigi Sborgia
Dario Sisto
Valentina Pastore
Claudio Furino
Rossella Donghia
Alessandra Sborgia
Francesco Boscia
Giovanni Alessio
author_facet Samuele Gigliola
Giancarlo Sborgia
Alfredo Niro
Carmela Palmisano
Pasquale Puzo
Gianluigi Giuliani
Luigi Sborgia
Dario Sisto
Valentina Pastore
Claudio Furino
Rossella Donghia
Alessandra Sborgia
Francesco Boscia
Giovanni Alessio
author_sort Samuele Gigliola
title Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_short Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_full Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
title_sort comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9075c5a4401d484c9543bf25ba97f77c
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelegigliola comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT giancarlosborgia comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT alfredoniro comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT carmelapalmisano comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT pasqualepuzo comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT gianluigigiuliani comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT luigisborgia comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT dariosisto comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT valentinapastore comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT claudiofurino comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT rosselladonghia comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT alessandrasborgia comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT francescoboscia comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
AT giovannialessio comparisonofperioperativeparametersinonehandedrotationalphacoemulsificationversusconventionalphacoemulsificationandfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgery
_version_ 1718409915048919040