Weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening of asymptomatic kindergarten to grade 12 students and staff helps inform strategies for safer in-person learning

Summary: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission in K–12 schools was rare during in 2020–2021; few studies included Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended screening of asymptomatic individuals. We conduct a prospective observational study of SA...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Shira Doron, Robin R. Ingalls, Anne Beauchamp, Jesse S. Boehm, Helen W. Boucher, Linda H. Chow, Linda Corridan, Katey Goehringer, Doug Golenbock, Liz Larsen, David Lussier, Marcia Testa, Andrea Ciaranello
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Elsevier 2021
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/90a57780293340a2b9be6f4eb595aacd
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:Summary: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission in K–12 schools was rare during in 2020–2021; few studies included Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended screening of asymptomatic individuals. We conduct a prospective observational study of SARS-CoV-2 screening in a mid-sized suburban public school district to evaluate the incidence of asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), document frequency of in-school transmission, and characterize barriers and facilitators to asymptomatic screening in schools. Staff and students undergo weekly pooled testing using home-collected saliva samples. Identification of >1 case in a school prompts investigation for in-school transmission and enhancement of safety strategies. With layered mitigation measures, in-school transmission even before student or staff vaccination is rare. Screening identifies a single cluster with in-school staff-to-staff transmission, informing decisions about in-person learning. The proportion of survey respondents self-reporting comfort with in-person learning before versus after implementation of screening increases. Costs exceed $260,000 for assays alone; staff and volunteers spend 135–145 h per week implementing screening.