A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication

Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known as fused deposition modeling (FDM™), is considered one of the most promising additive manufacturing (AM) methods for its versatility, reliability and affordability. First adopted by industries for professional uses such as rapid prototyping, then by the g...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yubo Tao, Fangong Kong, Zelong Li, Jingfa Zhang, Xin Zhao, Qing Yin, Dan Xing, Peng Li
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/90a73a23f18341f4b2cf5ef1ed0b1858
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:90a73a23f18341f4b2cf5ef1ed0b1858
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:90a73a23f18341f4b2cf5ef1ed0b18582021-11-10T04:27:47ZA review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication2238-785410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108https://doaj.org/article/90a73a23f18341f4b2cf5ef1ed0b18582021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785421012448https://doaj.org/toc/2238-7854Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known as fused deposition modeling (FDM™), is considered one of the most promising additive manufacturing (AM) methods for its versatility, reliability and affordability. First adopted by industries for professional uses such as rapid prototyping, then by the general public in recent years, FFF has gathered itself considerable attention. Nevertheless, despite key advancements in printer technologies and filament materials, the fabrication of robust, performing and functional parts for high-demanding practical applications remains a significant challenge. Due to intrinsic deficiencies, such as the presence of voids and weak layer-to-layer adhesion, FFF-printed parts are plagued by weak and anisotropic mechanical properties in contrast to their conventionally manufactured counterparts. With the increasing demand for designable porous structures in the fields of biomedicine, 4D printing and lightweight cellular composites, understanding the challenges presented by void presence has become more relevant than ever. As existing literature has reviewed the significance of interlayer bonding, this review focuses on documenting recent insights on the formation of voids by its categorization, research method and mechanism. The primary objective is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the two current primary methods of void research—quantitative analysis and imaging. Detailed discussions on the effects of feedstock and printing parameters on void formation are also presented. Lastly, this review discusses gaps in the current research and outlines unaddressed challenges regarding void formation and its relation with the mechanical performance of FFF parts.Yubo TaoFangong KongZelong LiJingfa ZhangXin ZhaoQing YinDan XingPeng LiElsevierarticleAdditive manufacturingFused filament fabricationVoid3D printing parametersFused deposition modelingExperimental designMining engineering. MetallurgyTN1-997ENJournal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol 15, Iss , Pp 4860-4879 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Additive manufacturing
Fused filament fabrication
Void
3D printing parameters
Fused deposition modeling
Experimental design
Mining engineering. Metallurgy
TN1-997
spellingShingle Additive manufacturing
Fused filament fabrication
Void
3D printing parameters
Fused deposition modeling
Experimental design
Mining engineering. Metallurgy
TN1-997
Yubo Tao
Fangong Kong
Zelong Li
Jingfa Zhang
Xin Zhao
Qing Yin
Dan Xing
Peng Li
A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication
description Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known as fused deposition modeling (FDM™), is considered one of the most promising additive manufacturing (AM) methods for its versatility, reliability and affordability. First adopted by industries for professional uses such as rapid prototyping, then by the general public in recent years, FFF has gathered itself considerable attention. Nevertheless, despite key advancements in printer technologies and filament materials, the fabrication of robust, performing and functional parts for high-demanding practical applications remains a significant challenge. Due to intrinsic deficiencies, such as the presence of voids and weak layer-to-layer adhesion, FFF-printed parts are plagued by weak and anisotropic mechanical properties in contrast to their conventionally manufactured counterparts. With the increasing demand for designable porous structures in the fields of biomedicine, 4D printing and lightweight cellular composites, understanding the challenges presented by void presence has become more relevant than ever. As existing literature has reviewed the significance of interlayer bonding, this review focuses on documenting recent insights on the formation of voids by its categorization, research method and mechanism. The primary objective is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the two current primary methods of void research—quantitative analysis and imaging. Detailed discussions on the effects of feedstock and printing parameters on void formation are also presented. Lastly, this review discusses gaps in the current research and outlines unaddressed challenges regarding void formation and its relation with the mechanical performance of FFF parts.
format article
author Yubo Tao
Fangong Kong
Zelong Li
Jingfa Zhang
Xin Zhao
Qing Yin
Dan Xing
Peng Li
author_facet Yubo Tao
Fangong Kong
Zelong Li
Jingfa Zhang
Xin Zhao
Qing Yin
Dan Xing
Peng Li
author_sort Yubo Tao
title A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication
title_short A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication
title_full A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication
title_fullStr A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication
title_full_unstemmed A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication
title_sort review on voids of 3d printed parts by fused filament fabrication
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/90a73a23f18341f4b2cf5ef1ed0b1858
work_keys_str_mv AT yubotao areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT fangongkong areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT zelongli areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT jingfazhang areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT xinzhao areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT qingyin areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT danxing areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT pengli areviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT yubotao reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT fangongkong reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT zelongli reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT jingfazhang reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT xinzhao reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT qingyin reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT danxing reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
AT pengli reviewonvoidsof3dprintedpartsbyfusedfilamentfabrication
_version_ 1718440673899708416