An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction

An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction

Ming ChenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USAPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ORange® Gen II (WaveTec Vision, Aliso Viejo, CA).Setting: The Surgical Suites, Honolulu, HI.Me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chen M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/90c55145977f46e9ab83ccc2b19fb106
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:90c55145977f46e9ab83ccc2b19fb106
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:90c55145977f46e9ab83ccc2b19fb1062021-12-02T00:03:13ZAn evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/90c55145977f46e9ab83ccc2b19fb1062012-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/an-evaluation-of-the-accuracy-of-the-orangereg-gen-ii-by-comparing-it--a9469https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Ming ChenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USAPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ORange® Gen II (WaveTec Vision, Aliso Viejo, CA).Setting: The Surgical Suites, Honolulu, HI.Methods: The prospective 28 consecutive cataract surgical cases were selected from 85 cataract surgical cases between December 16, 2010 and February 24, 2011. With the same intraocular lens implantation, the predicted spherical equivalent refraction from IOLMaster® (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and ORange Gen II were statistically compared and verified with 1-month postoperative manifest refraction. The data were put into IBM SPSS 19 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) for analysis of variance. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also calculated to evaluate the correlation between the IOLMaster, ORange Gen II, and 1-month postoperative manifest refraction.Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the mean spherical equivalent refraction from the IOLMaster, ORange Gen II, and 1-month postoperative manifest refraction (IOLMaster -0.40 diopters, P = 0.07; ORange Gen II -0.43 diopters, P = 0.16; 1-month refraction -0.41 diopters, P = 0.07). Pearson’s correlation study demonstrated that all three were positively correlated (P < 0.05), with the strongest correlation between the ORange Gen II and 1-month postoperative manifest refraction (r = +0.6, P < 0.01).Conclusion: The ORange Gen II can be considered as an alternative method for intraocular lens selection for cataract patients.Keywords: cataract surgery, phacoemulsification, IOL implantation, IOLMaster®, ORange® Gen II, postoperative refractionChen MDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2012, Iss default, Pp 397-401 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Chen M
An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
description Ming ChenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USAPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ORange® Gen II (WaveTec Vision, Aliso Viejo, CA).Setting: The Surgical Suites, Honolulu, HI.Methods: The prospective 28 consecutive cataract surgical cases were selected from 85 cataract surgical cases between December 16, 2010 and February 24, 2011. With the same intraocular lens implantation, the predicted spherical equivalent refraction from IOLMaster® (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and ORange Gen II were statistically compared and verified with 1-month postoperative manifest refraction. The data were put into IBM SPSS 19 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) for analysis of variance. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also calculated to evaluate the correlation between the IOLMaster, ORange Gen II, and 1-month postoperative manifest refraction.Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the mean spherical equivalent refraction from the IOLMaster, ORange Gen II, and 1-month postoperative manifest refraction (IOLMaster -0.40 diopters, P = 0.07; ORange Gen II -0.43 diopters, P = 0.16; 1-month refraction -0.41 diopters, P = 0.07). Pearson’s correlation study demonstrated that all three were positively correlated (P < 0.05), with the strongest correlation between the ORange Gen II and 1-month postoperative manifest refraction (r = +0.6, P < 0.01).Conclusion: The ORange Gen II can be considered as an alternative method for intraocular lens selection for cataract patients.Keywords: cataract surgery, phacoemulsification, IOL implantation, IOLMaster®, ORange® Gen II, postoperative refraction
format article
author Chen M
author_facet Chen M
author_sort Chen M
title An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
title_short An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
title_full An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
title_fullStr An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the accuracy of the ORange® (Gen II) by comparing it to the IOLMaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
title_sort evaluation of the accuracy of the orange® (gen ii) by comparing it to the iolmaster® in the prediction of postoperative refraction
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/90c55145977f46e9ab83ccc2b19fb106
work_keys_str_mv AT chenm anevaluationoftheaccuracyoftheorangeampreggeniibycomparingittotheiolmasterampreginthepredictionofpostoperativerefraction
AT chenm evaluationoftheaccuracyoftheorangeampreggeniibycomparingittotheiolmasterampreginthepredictionofpostoperativerefraction
_version_ 1718403999012487168

Ejemplares similares