TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT

The last forty years since the 1980s have witnessed intense attacks of the capital in all areas. Unfortunately, working life and employees in this context were seriously affected by these attacks. These attacks have increasingly condemned workers to precarious labor regimes. Precarization, expropria...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Şenol SIRMA
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2021
Materias:	insecurity poverty public space customize labor regime Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/90c6f87e7c134fa1b40e9c47b3ae094d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:90c6f87e7c134fa1b40e9c47b3ae094d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:90c6f87e7c134fa1b40e9c47b3ae094d2021-11-24T09:20:33ZTEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT2148-416310.29228/JASSS.49081https://doaj.org/article/90c6f87e7c134fa1b40e9c47b3ae094d2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=6a4d01b5-8d8f-4cba-8566-bae4af821c3e.pdf&key=49081https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163The last forty years since the 1980s have witnessed intense attacks of the capital in all areas. Unfortunately, working life and employees in this context were seriously affected by these attacks. These attacks have increasingly condemned workers to precarious labor regimes. Precarization, expropriation and, finally, impoverishment in the world of work were the main apparent consequences of these attacks. This process, which means the liquidation of the public sphere, also meant deregulation in working life. The commercialization of the public sphere and the transfer of public resources to the market and other non-market actors were among the salient features of this process. The 78-day period, starting on December 15, 2009 and ending March 2, 2010, was an open opposition to the above-mentioned attacks. In the cold and snowy days of Ankara, Tekel Workers managed to be the only agenda of almost the whole country against their social rights plundered through Privatization. The view that this struggle against marketization and precarization mentioned above is an anti-poverty movement at the same time forms the basis of this study. As a matter of fact, this struggle experience of Tekel Workers is just one of many examples that can be considered as anti-poverty. The Monopoly Resistance, which will be considered as an anti-poverty movement, is also an anti-poverty movement because it is a struggle of the working class, which has become impoverished as a result of neo-liberal policies, against poverty.Şenol SIRMAFırat Universityarticleinsecuritypovertypublic spacecustomizelabor regimeSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 14, Iss 85, Pp 541-548 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	insecurity poverty public space customize labor regime Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	insecurity poverty public space customize labor regime Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Şenol SIRMA TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT
description	The last forty years since the 1980s have witnessed intense attacks of the capital in all areas. Unfortunately, working life and employees in this context were seriously affected by these attacks. These attacks have increasingly condemned workers to precarious labor regimes. Precarization, expropriation and, finally, impoverishment in the world of work were the main apparent consequences of these attacks. This process, which means the liquidation of the public sphere, also meant deregulation in working life. The commercialization of the public sphere and the transfer of public resources to the market and other non-market actors were among the salient features of this process. The 78-day period, starting on December 15, 2009 and ending March 2, 2010, was an open opposition to the above-mentioned attacks. In the cold and snowy days of Ankara, Tekel Workers managed to be the only agenda of almost the whole country against their social rights plundered through Privatization. The view that this struggle against marketization and precarization mentioned above is an anti-poverty movement at the same time forms the basis of this study. As a matter of fact, this struggle experience of Tekel Workers is just one of many examples that can be considered as anti-poverty. The Monopoly Resistance, which will be considered as an anti-poverty movement, is also an anti-poverty movement because it is a struggle of the working class, which has become impoverished as a result of neo-liberal policies, against poverty.
format	article
author	Şenol SIRMA
author_facet	Şenol SIRMA
author_sort	Şenol SIRMA
title	TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT
title_short	TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT
title_full	TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT
title_fullStr	TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT
title_full_unstemmed	TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT
title_sort	tekel resistance as an anti-poverty movement
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/90c6f87e7c134fa1b40e9c47b3ae094d
work_keys_str_mv	AT senolsirma tekelresistanceasanantipovertymovement
_version_	1718415748703977472

TEKEL RESISTANCE AS AN ANTI-POVERTY MOVEMENT

Ejemplares similares