Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism

What is An analysis of Requiredness? This paper presents three versions of an argument in defence of a form of value-realism. The argument is based on a principle of nonreducibility of integral wholes to sums, as informally developed by Gestalt theorists, systematically worked out by Husserl in his...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Roberta De Monticelli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
IT
Publicado: Rosenberg & Sellier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/90c86a47af7640859af875b67102f3db
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:90c86a47af7640859af875b67102f3db
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:90c86a47af7640859af875b67102f3db2021-12-02T09:51:20ZRequiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism10.13128/Phe_Mi-195712280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/90c86a47af7640859af875b67102f3db2016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7130https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 What is An analysis of Requiredness? This paper presents three versions of an argument in defence of a form of value-realism. The argument is based on a principle of nonreducibility of integral wholes to sums, as informally developed by Gestalt theorists, systematically worked out by Husserl in his III Logical Investigation on wholes and parts, and exploited by Max Scheler’s theory of material and axiological apriori. Roberta De MonticelliRosenberg & SellierarticlevaluesnormsrealismGestalt TheoryAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 5 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
IT
topic values
norms
realism
Gestalt Theory
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
spellingShingle values
norms
realism
Gestalt Theory
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
Roberta De Monticelli
Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism
description What is An analysis of Requiredness? This paper presents three versions of an argument in defence of a form of value-realism. The argument is based on a principle of nonreducibility of integral wholes to sums, as informally developed by Gestalt theorists, systematically worked out by Husserl in his III Logical Investigation on wholes and parts, and exploited by Max Scheler’s theory of material and axiological apriori.
format article
author Roberta De Monticelli
author_facet Roberta De Monticelli
author_sort Roberta De Monticelli
title Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism
title_short Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism
title_full Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism
title_fullStr Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism
title_full_unstemmed Requiredness. An Argument for Value-Realism
title_sort requiredness. an argument for value-realism
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/90c86a47af7640859af875b67102f3db
work_keys_str_mv AT robertademonticelli requirednessanargumentforvaluerealism
_version_ 1718398017485144064