Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine

Abstract A known prevalence of concurrent cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis was shown to be 5–25%, but there is a lack of evidence regarding direct relationships in canal dimension and canal-body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine. Total 247 patients (mean age: 61 years, male: 135) with cervi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung-Hee Lee, Kyung-Chung Kang, Ki-Tack Kim, Yong-Chan Kim, Tae-Soo Chang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/90e5537f9c074bbd8ad77e73d5124a57
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:90e5537f9c074bbd8ad77e73d5124a57
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:90e5537f9c074bbd8ad77e73d5124a572021-12-02T18:02:15ZExtent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine10.1038/s41598-021-98038-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/90e5537f9c074bbd8ad77e73d5124a572021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98038-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract A known prevalence of concurrent cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis was shown to be 5–25%, but there is a lack of evidence regarding direct relationships in canal dimension and canal-body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine. Total 247 patients (mean age: 61 years, male: 135) with cervical and lumbar computed tomography scans were retrospectively reviewed. Midsagittal vertebral body and canal diameters in reconstructed images were measured at all cervical and lumbar vertebrae, and canal-body ratios were calculated. The canal diameter and ratio were also compared according to the gender and age, and correlation analysis was performed for each value. There were significant correlations between cervical (C3–C7) and lumbar (L1–L5) canal dimension (p < 0.001). C5 canal diameter was most significantly correlated with L4 canal diameter (r = 0.435, p < 0.001). Cervical canal-body ratios (C3–C7) were also correlated with those of lumbar spine (L1–L5) (p < 0.001). The canal-body ratio of C3 was most highly correlated with L3 (r = 0.477, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, mean canal-body ratios of C3 and L3 were significantly smaller in male patients than female (p = 0.038 and p < 0.001) and patient’s age was inversely correlated with C5 canal diameter (r = − 0.223, p < 0.001) and C3 canal-body ratio (r = − 0.224, p < 0.001). Spinal canal dimension and canal-body ratio have moderate degrees of correlations between cervical and lumbar spine and the elderly male patients show the tendency of small canal diameter and canal-body ratio. This relationship of cervical and lumbar spine can be an important evidence to explain to the patients.Jung-Hee LeeKyung-Chung KangKi-Tack KimYong-Chan KimTae-Soo ChangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jung-Hee Lee
Kyung-Chung Kang
Ki-Tack Kim
Yong-Chan Kim
Tae-Soo Chang
Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
description Abstract A known prevalence of concurrent cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis was shown to be 5–25%, but there is a lack of evidence regarding direct relationships in canal dimension and canal-body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine. Total 247 patients (mean age: 61 years, male: 135) with cervical and lumbar computed tomography scans were retrospectively reviewed. Midsagittal vertebral body and canal diameters in reconstructed images were measured at all cervical and lumbar vertebrae, and canal-body ratios were calculated. The canal diameter and ratio were also compared according to the gender and age, and correlation analysis was performed for each value. There were significant correlations between cervical (C3–C7) and lumbar (L1–L5) canal dimension (p < 0.001). C5 canal diameter was most significantly correlated with L4 canal diameter (r = 0.435, p < 0.001). Cervical canal-body ratios (C3–C7) were also correlated with those of lumbar spine (L1–L5) (p < 0.001). The canal-body ratio of C3 was most highly correlated with L3 (r = 0.477, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, mean canal-body ratios of C3 and L3 were significantly smaller in male patients than female (p = 0.038 and p < 0.001) and patient’s age was inversely correlated with C5 canal diameter (r = − 0.223, p < 0.001) and C3 canal-body ratio (r = − 0.224, p < 0.001). Spinal canal dimension and canal-body ratio have moderate degrees of correlations between cervical and lumbar spine and the elderly male patients show the tendency of small canal diameter and canal-body ratio. This relationship of cervical and lumbar spine can be an important evidence to explain to the patients.
format article
author Jung-Hee Lee
Kyung-Chung Kang
Ki-Tack Kim
Yong-Chan Kim
Tae-Soo Chang
author_facet Jung-Hee Lee
Kyung-Chung Kang
Ki-Tack Kim
Yong-Chan Kim
Tae-Soo Chang
author_sort Jung-Hee Lee
title Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
title_short Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
title_full Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
title_fullStr Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
title_full_unstemmed Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
title_sort extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/90e5537f9c074bbd8ad77e73d5124a57
work_keys_str_mv AT jungheelee extentandcharacteristicofrelationshipsincanaldimensionandcanalbodyratiobetweencervicalandlumbarspine
AT kyungchungkang extentandcharacteristicofrelationshipsincanaldimensionandcanalbodyratiobetweencervicalandlumbarspine
AT kitackkim extentandcharacteristicofrelationshipsincanaldimensionandcanalbodyratiobetweencervicalandlumbarspine
AT yongchankim extentandcharacteristicofrelationshipsincanaldimensionandcanalbodyratiobetweencervicalandlumbarspine
AT taesoochang extentandcharacteristicofrelationshipsincanaldimensionandcanalbodyratiobetweencervicalandlumbarspine
_version_ 1718378941344907264