“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin
Russian Modernism scholar Leonid Konstantinovich Dolgolopov (1928– 1995) authored only a couple of research articles concerning Ivan Bunin, but these papers were important in the process of Bunin’s interpretation in the 1970s. Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Bunin from his archive, preserved by th...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/90f345c8e86b497981c8329e801b0c83 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:90f345c8e86b497981c8329e801b0c83 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:90f345c8e86b497981c8329e801b0c832021-11-23T16:53:00Z“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin10.22455/2541-8297-2020-16-182-1992541-82972542-2421https://doaj.org/article/90f345c8e86b497981c8329e801b0c832020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://litfact.ru/images/2020-16/LF-2020-2-16_182-199_Molodiakov.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2541-8297https://doaj.org/toc/2542-2421Russian Modernism scholar Leonid Konstantinovich Dolgolopov (1928– 1995) authored only a couple of research articles concerning Ivan Bunin, but these papers were important in the process of Bunin’s interpretation in the 1970s. Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Bunin from his archive, preserved by the author and donated to the Pushkin House in 2019, add a lot to his known works. Applying Tynianov’s formula “archaists and innovators”, Dolgopolov described Bunin as a “man of the nineteenth century” totally alien to the twentieth century’s literature, not only modernist one. Bunin’s rejection of contemporary literature and its subjects related to his attitude to Russian revolution, which he did not expect and which he perceived as a spontaneous revolt, not as a global social shift. Also, polemicizing with O. Mikhailov’s interpretation, Dolgopolov defined “Cornet Yelagin’s Case” (1925) as an experimental novel mainly influenced by Dostoevsky, a novelist profoundly alien to Bunin. According to Dolgopolov, it is because of Dostoevsky’s influence that artistic discoveries, made in this novel, were not further developed in the writer's work.Vassili MolodiakovRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticleivan buninleonid dolgopolovhistory of literary studiesmodernismrevolutionLiterature (General)PN1-6790Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUЛитературный факт, Iss 2 (16), Pp 182-199 (2020) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
ivan bunin leonid dolgopolov history of literary studies modernism revolution Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
| spellingShingle |
ivan bunin leonid dolgopolov history of literary studies modernism revolution Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Vassili Molodiakov “He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin |
| description |
Russian Modernism scholar Leonid Konstantinovich Dolgolopov (1928– 1995) authored only a couple of research articles concerning Ivan Bunin, but these papers were important in the process of Bunin’s interpretation in the 1970s. Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Bunin from his archive, preserved by the author and donated to the Pushkin House in 2019, add a lot to his known works. Applying Tynianov’s formula “archaists and innovators”, Dolgopolov described Bunin as a “man of the nineteenth century” totally alien to the twentieth century’s literature, not only modernist one. Bunin’s rejection of contemporary literature and its subjects related to his attitude to Russian revolution, which he did not expect and which he perceived as a spontaneous revolt, not as a global social shift. Also, polemicizing with O. Mikhailov’s interpretation, Dolgopolov defined “Cornet Yelagin’s Case” (1925) as an experimental novel mainly influenced by Dostoevsky, a novelist profoundly alien to Bunin. According to Dolgopolov, it is because of Dostoevsky’s influence that artistic discoveries, made in this novel, were not further developed in the writer's work. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Vassili Molodiakov |
| author_facet |
Vassili Molodiakov |
| author_sort |
Vassili Molodiakov |
| title |
“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin |
| title_short |
“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin |
| title_full |
“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin |
| title_fullStr |
“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin |
| title_full_unstemmed |
“He didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: Leonid Dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on Ivan Bunin |
| title_sort |
“he didn’t want to admit the peculiar nature of the two centuries’ boundary period”: leonid dolgopolov’s unpublished notes on ivan bunin |
| publisher |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/90f345c8e86b497981c8329e801b0c83 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT vassilimolodiakov hedidntwanttoadmitthepeculiarnatureofthetwocenturiesboundaryperiodleoniddolgopolovsunpublishednotesonivanbunin |
| _version_ |
1718416221744922624 |