A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”

Rudenko and Liashenko’s (2020) “Chinese studies in Ukrainian philosophy of the Soviet period” explores the philosophy and political thought of that time through the study of a Soviet-era book on Chinese philosophy. Their article argues that the content and structure of Dmytrychenko and Shynkaruk’s (...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Feng-Shuo Chang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
UK
Publicado: International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/91064f2415854278ac75f08128a848d8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:91064f2415854278ac75f08128a848d8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:91064f2415854278ac75f08128a848d82021-11-21T11:42:10ZA Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”10.29202/fhi/16/122311-88222519-2604https://doaj.org/article/91064f2415854278ac75f08128a848d82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.fhijournal.org/journals/2021/16/FHI_16_Chang.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2311-8822https://doaj.org/toc/2519-2604Rudenko and Liashenko’s (2020) “Chinese studies in Ukrainian philosophy of the Soviet period” explores the philosophy and political thought of that time through the study of a Soviet-era book on Chinese philosophy. Their article argues that the content and structure of Dmytrychenko and Shynkaruk’s (1958) book “The development of philosophical thought in ancient China” reflects its authors’ political education intentions. This analytical argument is comprehensively presented in the paper and effectively articulates the particularity of this Ukrainian book on Chinese philosophy. In this article, I examine Rudenko and Liashenko’s paper from the perspective of positivism and of an individual who received a traditional Chinese education. Through a comparison with other books on Chinese philosophy, I discuss Rudenko and Liashenko’s argument regarding the materialist historical view of Dmytrychenko and Shynkaruk’s book. The lack of excerpts from the original Chinese texts affects the correctness of some interpretations in the reviewed article. Nonetheless, through a dialogue between the two authors and contemporary philosophers, the reviewed article touches upon many philosophical ideas and research topics that are worth reading and studying, especially in terms of socialist philosophy, the historical development of Marxism, and the study of Ukrainian philosophy.Feng-Shuo ChangInternational Society of Philosophy and Cosmologyarticlechinese philosophymaterialismmarxismreception studysoviet periodukrainian philosophyEducationLENRUUKFuture Human Image, Vol 16, Pp 122-127 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
UK
topic chinese philosophy
materialism
marxism
reception study
soviet period
ukrainian philosophy
Education
L
spellingShingle chinese philosophy
materialism
marxism
reception study
soviet period
ukrainian philosophy
Education
L
Feng-Shuo Chang
A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”
description Rudenko and Liashenko’s (2020) “Chinese studies in Ukrainian philosophy of the Soviet period” explores the philosophy and political thought of that time through the study of a Soviet-era book on Chinese philosophy. Their article argues that the content and structure of Dmytrychenko and Shynkaruk’s (1958) book “The development of philosophical thought in ancient China” reflects its authors’ political education intentions. This analytical argument is comprehensively presented in the paper and effectively articulates the particularity of this Ukrainian book on Chinese philosophy. In this article, I examine Rudenko and Liashenko’s paper from the perspective of positivism and of an individual who received a traditional Chinese education. Through a comparison with other books on Chinese philosophy, I discuss Rudenko and Liashenko’s argument regarding the materialist historical view of Dmytrychenko and Shynkaruk’s book. The lack of excerpts from the original Chinese texts affects the correctness of some interpretations in the reviewed article. Nonetheless, through a dialogue between the two authors and contemporary philosophers, the reviewed article touches upon many philosophical ideas and research topics that are worth reading and studying, especially in terms of socialist philosophy, the historical development of Marxism, and the study of Ukrainian philosophy.
format article
author Feng-Shuo Chang
author_facet Feng-Shuo Chang
author_sort Feng-Shuo Chang
title A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”
title_short A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”
title_full A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”
title_fullStr A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”
title_full_unstemmed A Ukrainian Interpretation of Chinese Philosophy in the Soviet Period: A Review of “Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period”
title_sort ukrainian interpretation of chinese philosophy in the soviet period: a review of “chinese studies in ukrainian philosophy of the soviet period”
publisher International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/91064f2415854278ac75f08128a848d8
work_keys_str_mv AT fengshuochang aukrainianinterpretationofchinesephilosophyinthesovietperiodareviewofchinesestudiesinukrainianphilosophyofthesovietperiod
AT fengshuochang ukrainianinterpretationofchinesephilosophyinthesovietperiodareviewofchinesestudiesinukrainianphilosophyofthesovietperiod
_version_ 1718419377983848448