Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma

Abstract The prognostic factors and optimal treatment for the elderly patient with glioblastoma (GBM) were poorly understood. This study extracted 4975 elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with histologically confirmed GBM from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Firstly, Cumula...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuo-yi Liu, Song-shan Feng, Yi-hao Zhang, Li-yang Zhang, Sheng-chao Xu, Jing Li, Hui Cao, Jun Huang, Fan Fan, Li Cheng, Jun-yi Jiang, Quan Cheng, Zhi-xiong Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9139eac8a3b14c36bff8bb5a777559a9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9139eac8a3b14c36bff8bb5a777559a9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9139eac8a3b14c36bff8bb5a777559a92021-12-02T16:55:24ZCompeting risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma10.1038/s41598-021-88820-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9139eac8a3b14c36bff8bb5a777559a92021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88820-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The prognostic factors and optimal treatment for the elderly patient with glioblastoma (GBM) were poorly understood. This study extracted 4975 elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with histologically confirmed GBM from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Firstly, Cumulative incidence function and cox proportional model were utilized to illustrate the interference of non-GBM related mortality in our cohort. Then, the Fine-Gray competing risk model was applied to determine the prognostic factors for GBM related mortality. Age ≥ 75 years old, white race, size > 5.4 cm, frontal lobe tumor, and overlapping lesion were independently associated with more GBM related death, while Gross total resection (GTR) (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.80–0.94, P = 0.010), radiotherapy (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.55–0.74, P < 0.001), chemotherapy (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.59–0.90, P = 0.003), and chemoRT (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.38–0.48, P < 0.001) were identified as independently protective factors of GBM related death. Based on this, a corresponding nomogram was conducted to predict 3-, 6- and 12-month GBM related mortality, the C-index of which were 0.763, 0.718, and 0.694 respectively. The calibration curve showed that there was a good consistency between the predicted and the actual mortality probability. Concerning treatment options, GTR followed by chemoRT is suggested as optimal treatment. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone also provide moderate clinical benefits.Zhuo-yi LiuSong-shan FengYi-hao ZhangLi-yang ZhangSheng-chao XuJing LiHui CaoJun HuangFan FanLi ChengJun-yi JiangQuan ChengZhi-xiong LiuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Zhuo-yi Liu
Song-shan Feng
Yi-hao Zhang
Li-yang Zhang
Sheng-chao Xu
Jing Li
Hui Cao
Jun Huang
Fan Fan
Li Cheng
Jun-yi Jiang
Quan Cheng
Zhi-xiong Liu
Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
description Abstract The prognostic factors and optimal treatment for the elderly patient with glioblastoma (GBM) were poorly understood. This study extracted 4975 elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with histologically confirmed GBM from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Firstly, Cumulative incidence function and cox proportional model were utilized to illustrate the interference of non-GBM related mortality in our cohort. Then, the Fine-Gray competing risk model was applied to determine the prognostic factors for GBM related mortality. Age ≥ 75 years old, white race, size > 5.4 cm, frontal lobe tumor, and overlapping lesion were independently associated with more GBM related death, while Gross total resection (GTR) (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.80–0.94, P = 0.010), radiotherapy (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.55–0.74, P < 0.001), chemotherapy (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.59–0.90, P = 0.003), and chemoRT (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.38–0.48, P < 0.001) were identified as independently protective factors of GBM related death. Based on this, a corresponding nomogram was conducted to predict 3-, 6- and 12-month GBM related mortality, the C-index of which were 0.763, 0.718, and 0.694 respectively. The calibration curve showed that there was a good consistency between the predicted and the actual mortality probability. Concerning treatment options, GTR followed by chemoRT is suggested as optimal treatment. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone also provide moderate clinical benefits.
format article
author Zhuo-yi Liu
Song-shan Feng
Yi-hao Zhang
Li-yang Zhang
Sheng-chao Xu
Jing Li
Hui Cao
Jun Huang
Fan Fan
Li Cheng
Jun-yi Jiang
Quan Cheng
Zhi-xiong Liu
author_facet Zhuo-yi Liu
Song-shan Feng
Yi-hao Zhang
Li-yang Zhang
Sheng-chao Xu
Jing Li
Hui Cao
Jun Huang
Fan Fan
Li Cheng
Jun-yi Jiang
Quan Cheng
Zhi-xiong Liu
author_sort Zhuo-yi Liu
title Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
title_short Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
title_full Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
title_fullStr Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
title_sort competing risk model to determine the prognostic factors and treatment strategies for elderly patients with glioblastoma
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9139eac8a3b14c36bff8bb5a777559a9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuoyiliu competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT songshanfeng competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT yihaozhang competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT liyangzhang competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT shengchaoxu competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT jingli competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT huicao competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT junhuang competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT fanfan competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT licheng competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT junyijiang competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT quancheng competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
AT zhixiongliu competingriskmodeltodeterminetheprognosticfactorsandtreatmentstrategiesforelderlypatientswithglioblastoma
_version_ 1718382874187530240