The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways

Many countries have indicated to plan or consider the use of carbon pricing. Model-based scenarios are used to inform policymakers about emissions pathways and cost-effective carbon prices. Many of these scenarios are based on the Hotelling rule, assuming that a carbon price path increasing with the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andries F. Hof, Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst, Detlef P. van Vuuren
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9159d011ec674a7dadf057a56c74ed85
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9159d011ec674a7dadf057a56c74ed85
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9159d011ec674a7dadf057a56c74ed852021-12-01T23:17:56ZThe Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways2624-955310.3389/fclim.2021.785577https://doaj.org/article/9159d011ec674a7dadf057a56c74ed852021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.785577/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2624-9553Many countries have indicated to plan or consider the use of carbon pricing. Model-based scenarios are used to inform policymakers about emissions pathways and cost-effective carbon prices. Many of these scenarios are based on the Hotelling rule, assuming that a carbon price path increasing with the interest rate leads to a cost-effective strategy. We test the robustness of this rule by using experiments with plausible assumptions for learning by doing, inertia in reducing emissions, and restrictions on net-negative emissions. Analytically, we show that if mitigation technologies become cheaper if their capacities are increased, Hotelling does not always apply anymore. Moreover, the initial carbon price is heavily influenced by restrictions on net-negative emissions and the pathway by both restrictions on net-negative emissions and socio-economic inertia. This means that Hotelling pathways are not necessarily optimal: in fact, combining learning by doing and the above restrictions leads to initial carbon prices that are more than twice as high as a Hotelling pathway and thus to much earlier emission reductions. The optimal price path also increases less strongly and may even decline later in the century, leading to higher initial abatement costs but much lower long-term costs.Andries F. HofAndries F. HofKaj-Ivar van der WijstKaj-Ivar van der WijstKaj-Ivar van der WijstDetlef P. van VuurenDetlef P. van VuurenFrontiers Media S.A.articleclimate change mitigationcarbon pricecost-effective pathwaysinertianegative emissionslearning by doingEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENFrontiers in Climate, Vol 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic climate change mitigation
carbon price
cost-effective pathways
inertia
negative emissions
learning by doing
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle climate change mitigation
carbon price
cost-effective pathways
inertia
negative emissions
learning by doing
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Andries F. Hof
Andries F. Hof
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren
The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways
description Many countries have indicated to plan or consider the use of carbon pricing. Model-based scenarios are used to inform policymakers about emissions pathways and cost-effective carbon prices. Many of these scenarios are based on the Hotelling rule, assuming that a carbon price path increasing with the interest rate leads to a cost-effective strategy. We test the robustness of this rule by using experiments with plausible assumptions for learning by doing, inertia in reducing emissions, and restrictions on net-negative emissions. Analytically, we show that if mitigation technologies become cheaper if their capacities are increased, Hotelling does not always apply anymore. Moreover, the initial carbon price is heavily influenced by restrictions on net-negative emissions and the pathway by both restrictions on net-negative emissions and socio-economic inertia. This means that Hotelling pathways are not necessarily optimal: in fact, combining learning by doing and the above restrictions leads to initial carbon prices that are more than twice as high as a Hotelling pathway and thus to much earlier emission reductions. The optimal price path also increases less strongly and may even decline later in the century, leading to higher initial abatement costs but much lower long-term costs.
format article
author Andries F. Hof
Andries F. Hof
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren
author_facet Andries F. Hof
Andries F. Hof
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren
author_sort Andries F. Hof
title The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways
title_short The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways
title_full The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways
title_fullStr The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Socio-Economic Inertia and Restrictions on Net-Negative Emissions on Cost-Effective Carbon Price Pathways
title_sort impact of socio-economic inertia and restrictions on net-negative emissions on cost-effective carbon price pathways
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9159d011ec674a7dadf057a56c74ed85
work_keys_str_mv AT andriesfhof theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT andriesfhof theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT kajivarvanderwijst theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT kajivarvanderwijst theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT kajivarvanderwijst theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT detlefpvanvuuren theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT detlefpvanvuuren theimpactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT andriesfhof impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT andriesfhof impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT kajivarvanderwijst impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT kajivarvanderwijst impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT kajivarvanderwijst impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT detlefpvanvuuren impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
AT detlefpvanvuuren impactofsocioeconomicinertiaandrestrictionsonnetnegativeemissionsoncosteffectivecarbonpricepathways
_version_ 1718403999202279424