Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Charlotte Hager, Homan Taufik, Friederike Blum, Andrea Stockero, Martin Wiesmann, Arno Reich, Rebecca May, Omid Nikoubashman
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb36468
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb36468
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb364682021-12-02T20:11:17ZWork satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0251889https://doaj.org/article/91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb364682021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251889https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background and purpose</h4>During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We analyzed the effects of this feedback on work satisfaction, work meaningfulness and valuation of the therapy among our staff.<h4>Methods</h4>Our staff completed two self-reported questionnaires before and after the period of six months with systematic feedback.<h4>Results</h4>Employees with higher work meaningfulness and higher work satisfaction valuated endovascular stroke therapy as more useful (p<0.001). A good clinical outcome was regarded more motivating than a good interventional outcome (p<0.001). Receiving systematic feedback did not increase work satisfaction (p = 0.318) or work meaningfulness (p = 0.178). Radiographers valuated the usefulness of interventional therapy the worst of all employees (p≤ 0.017). After the feedback period, 75% of radiographers estimated stroke as a more severe disease than before. Also, their desire for feedback decreased significantly (p = 0.007). Primarily patient cases with unfavorable outcomes were remembered by the staff.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Systematic email feedback does not per se enhance work satisfaction or work meaningfulness among employees. However, receiving feedback is educative for the staff. Evaluating work satisfaction and the perception of treatment may help to identify unexpected issues and may therefore help to find specific measures that increase work satisfaction and motivation.Charlotte HagerHoman TaufikFriederike BlumAndrea StockeroMartin WiesmannArno ReichRebecca MayOmid NikoubashmanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0251889 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Charlotte Hager Homan Taufik Friederike Blum Andrea Stockero Martin Wiesmann Arno Reich Rebecca May Omid Nikoubashman Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
description	<h4>Background and purpose</h4>During a period of 6 months, we provided our entire neuroradiological staff including physicians, radiographers, and researchers with systematic feedback via email on the further clinical course of stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We analyzed the effects of this feedback on work satisfaction, work meaningfulness and valuation of the therapy among our staff.<h4>Methods</h4>Our staff completed two self-reported questionnaires before and after the period of six months with systematic feedback.<h4>Results</h4>Employees with higher work meaningfulness and higher work satisfaction valuated endovascular stroke therapy as more useful (p<0.001). A good clinical outcome was regarded more motivating than a good interventional outcome (p<0.001). Receiving systematic feedback did not increase work satisfaction (p = 0.318) or work meaningfulness (p = 0.178). Radiographers valuated the usefulness of interventional therapy the worst of all employees (p≤ 0.017). After the feedback period, 75% of radiographers estimated stroke as a more severe disease than before. Also, their desire for feedback decreased significantly (p = 0.007). Primarily patient cases with unfavorable outcomes were remembered by the staff.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Systematic email feedback does not per se enhance work satisfaction or work meaningfulness among employees. However, receiving feedback is educative for the staff. Evaluating work satisfaction and the perception of treatment may help to identify unexpected issues and may therefore help to find specific measures that increase work satisfaction and motivation.
format	article
author	Charlotte Hager Homan Taufik Friederike Blum Andrea Stockero Martin Wiesmann Arno Reich Rebecca May Omid Nikoubashman
author_facet	Charlotte Hager Homan Taufik Friederike Blum Andrea Stockero Martin Wiesmann Arno Reich Rebecca May Omid Nikoubashman
author_sort	Charlotte Hager
title	Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_short	Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_full	Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_fullStr	Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_full_unstemmed	Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
title_sort	work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/91a7b0b83b514f76917ab6a05bb36468
work_keys_str_mv	AT charlottehager worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT homantaufik worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT friederikeblum worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT andreastockero worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT martinwiesmann worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT arnoreich worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT rebeccamay worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients AT omidnikoubashman worksatisfactionamongneuroradiologystaffafterreceivingfollowupreportsofthrombectomystrokepatients
_version_	1718374899155730432

Work satisfaction among neuroradiology staff after receiving follow up reports of thrombectomy stroke patients.

Ejemplares similares