Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists
The present study had a convenience sample with 236 laypeople and 242 dentists who completed an online questionnaire to choose the most attractive image among six pairs for comparison. Control image: symmetric (parallelism between occlusal plane (OP), commissural line (CL), and interpupillary line (...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/91b1c05a7aca4cc0b39f1bc886d00aa4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:91b1c05a7aca4cc0b39f1bc886d00aa4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:91b1c05a7aca4cc0b39f1bc886d00aa42021-11-25T17:52:33ZAesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists10.3390/ijerph1822122581660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/91b1c05a7aca4cc0b39f1bc886d00aa42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12258https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601The present study had a convenience sample with 236 laypeople and 242 dentists who completed an online questionnaire to choose the most attractive image among six pairs for comparison. Control image: symmetric (parallelism between occlusal plane (OP), commissural line (CL), and interpupillary line (IL)). Change of Control, obtaining three images with a 3-degree inclination of the labial commissures. Image A: OP parallel to IL; Image B: OP parallel to CL; Image C: OP at 1.5 degree mean angulation between IL and CL. Non-parametric comparison (IBM© SPSS Statistics vs. 27.0, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The “Dentists” group’s decreasing order of preference (attractiveness) of the images is: Control > A > C > B (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the “Lay” group, it is: Control > A > (C not ≠ B). Dentists significantly prefer more the Control and Image A than laypeople (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Sex (single exception in laypeople), age, and dentist’s area of activity did not interfere in the perception of attractiveness. Dentists and laypeople preferred the Control when compared to images with CL canted. In the existence of CL inclination, the preference of the groups was the IL as a reference for OP orientation, with the mean angulation or coincident with the CL being considered less aesthetic.Ana Lidia CarvalhoLiliana Gavinha CostaJoana Meneses MartinsMaria Conceição MansoSandra GavinhaMariano Herrero-ClimentBlanca Ríos-CarrascoCarlos FalcãoPaulo RibeiroMDPI AGarticleprosthodonticsdental estheticsocclusal plane cantingcommissural linesinterpupillary linefacial asymmetryMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 12258, p 12258 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
prosthodontics dental esthetics occlusal plane canting commissural lines interpupillary line facial asymmetry Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
prosthodontics dental esthetics occlusal plane canting commissural lines interpupillary line facial asymmetry Medicine R Ana Lidia Carvalho Liliana Gavinha Costa Joana Meneses Martins Maria Conceição Manso Sandra Gavinha Mariano Herrero-Climent Blanca Ríos-Carrasco Carlos Falcão Paulo Ribeiro Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists |
description |
The present study had a convenience sample with 236 laypeople and 242 dentists who completed an online questionnaire to choose the most attractive image among six pairs for comparison. Control image: symmetric (parallelism between occlusal plane (OP), commissural line (CL), and interpupillary line (IL)). Change of Control, obtaining three images with a 3-degree inclination of the labial commissures. Image A: OP parallel to IL; Image B: OP parallel to CL; Image C: OP at 1.5 degree mean angulation between IL and CL. Non-parametric comparison (IBM© SPSS Statistics vs. 27.0, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The “Dentists” group’s decreasing order of preference (attractiveness) of the images is: Control > A > C > B (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the “Lay” group, it is: Control > A > (C not ≠ B). Dentists significantly prefer more the Control and Image A than laypeople (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Sex (single exception in laypeople), age, and dentist’s area of activity did not interfere in the perception of attractiveness. Dentists and laypeople preferred the Control when compared to images with CL canted. In the existence of CL inclination, the preference of the groups was the IL as a reference for OP orientation, with the mean angulation or coincident with the CL being considered less aesthetic. |
format |
article |
author |
Ana Lidia Carvalho Liliana Gavinha Costa Joana Meneses Martins Maria Conceição Manso Sandra Gavinha Mariano Herrero-Climent Blanca Ríos-Carrasco Carlos Falcão Paulo Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Ana Lidia Carvalho Liliana Gavinha Costa Joana Meneses Martins Maria Conceição Manso Sandra Gavinha Mariano Herrero-Climent Blanca Ríos-Carrasco Carlos Falcão Paulo Ribeiro |
author_sort |
Ana Lidia Carvalho |
title |
Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists |
title_short |
Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists |
title_full |
Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists |
title_fullStr |
Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists |
title_sort |
aesthetic preference in the transverse orientation of the occlusal plane in rehabilitation: perspective of laypeople and dentists |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/91b1c05a7aca4cc0b39f1bc886d00aa4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT analidiacarvalho aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT lilianagavinhacosta aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT joanamenesesmartins aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT mariaconceicaomanso aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT sandragavinha aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT marianoherrerocliment aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT blancarioscarrasco aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT carlosfalcao aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists AT pauloribeiro aestheticpreferenceinthetransverseorientationoftheocclusalplaneinrehabilitationperspectiveoflaypeopleanddentists |
_version_ |
1718411934926110720 |