The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract A few modes of perioperative local analgesia have been studied in order to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopy, including preemptive local anesthetics in the trocar sites and intraperitoneal anesthetics administration at the end of the surgery. However, the evidence regarding their...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohad Gluck, Elad Barber, Ohad Feldstein, Ori Tal, Ram Kerner, Ran Keidar, Inna Wolfson, Shimon Ginath, Jacob Bar, Ron Sagiv
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/91b7ec522c664c27b97f39d3a0b4ec12
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:91b7ec522c664c27b97f39d3a0b4ec12
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:91b7ec522c664c27b97f39d3a0b4ec122021-12-02T11:46:07ZThe effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial10.1038/s41598-020-80130-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/91b7ec522c664c27b97f39d3a0b4ec122021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80130-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract A few modes of perioperative local analgesia have been studied in order to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopy, including preemptive local anesthetics in the trocar sites and intraperitoneal anesthetics administration at the end of the surgery. However, the evidence regarding their efficacy are conflicting. In addition, the combination of both aforementioned methods has been rarely studied. Our aim was to evaluate whether subcutaneous trocar site and/or intraperitoneal analgesia reduce pain after gynecologic operative laparoscopy. This was a single-centered, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four equally sized groups: group 1—subcutaneous and intraperitoneal analgesia; group 2—subcutaneous analgesia and intraperitoneal placebo; group 3—subcutaneous placebo and intraperitoneal analgesia; Group 4—subcutaneous and intraperitoneal placebo. The patients, the surgeons, and the pain evaluators were all blinded to the patient’s allocation. Included were patients who underwent elective operative laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: active infection, pregnancy, known sensitivity to Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride, chronic pelvic pain, surgeries with additional vaginal procedures, conversion to laparotomy, and malignancy. A total of 9 ml of Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride (Marcaine) 0.5%, or Sodium-Chloride 0.9%, as a placebo, were injected subcutaneously to the trocar sites (3 ml to each trocar site), prior to skin incision. In addition, 10 ml of Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride 0.5%, diluted with 40 ml of Sodium-Chloride 0.9% (a total of 50 ml solution), or 50 ml of Sodium-Chloride 0.9%, as a placebo, were injected intraperitoneally at the end of the surgery. By utilizing the 10 cm Visual-analogue-scale (VAS) we assessed post-operative pain at rest at 3, 8, and 24 h, and during ambulation at 8 and 24 h. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov. We conformed to the CONSORT recommendations. Between December 2016 and July 2019, a total of 119 patients were included in the study. Demographic and interventional characteristics were similar among the groups. The level of postoperative pain, either at rest or with change of position, was not significantly different between the groups, at all-time points. Application of subcutaneous and/or intraperitoneal analgesia is not effective in reducing pain after gynecologic operative laparoscopy. Clinical trial identification number: NCT02976571. Date of trial registration 11/29/2016. URL of the registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov .Ohad GluckElad BarberOhad FeldsteinOri TalRam KernerRan KeidarInna WolfsonShimon GinathJacob BarRon SagivNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ohad Gluck
Elad Barber
Ohad Feldstein
Ori Tal
Ram Kerner
Ran Keidar
Inna Wolfson
Shimon Ginath
Jacob Bar
Ron Sagiv
The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
description Abstract A few modes of perioperative local analgesia have been studied in order to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopy, including preemptive local anesthetics in the trocar sites and intraperitoneal anesthetics administration at the end of the surgery. However, the evidence regarding their efficacy are conflicting. In addition, the combination of both aforementioned methods has been rarely studied. Our aim was to evaluate whether subcutaneous trocar site and/or intraperitoneal analgesia reduce pain after gynecologic operative laparoscopy. This was a single-centered, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four equally sized groups: group 1—subcutaneous and intraperitoneal analgesia; group 2—subcutaneous analgesia and intraperitoneal placebo; group 3—subcutaneous placebo and intraperitoneal analgesia; Group 4—subcutaneous and intraperitoneal placebo. The patients, the surgeons, and the pain evaluators were all blinded to the patient’s allocation. Included were patients who underwent elective operative laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: active infection, pregnancy, known sensitivity to Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride, chronic pelvic pain, surgeries with additional vaginal procedures, conversion to laparotomy, and malignancy. A total of 9 ml of Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride (Marcaine) 0.5%, or Sodium-Chloride 0.9%, as a placebo, were injected subcutaneously to the trocar sites (3 ml to each trocar site), prior to skin incision. In addition, 10 ml of Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride 0.5%, diluted with 40 ml of Sodium-Chloride 0.9% (a total of 50 ml solution), or 50 ml of Sodium-Chloride 0.9%, as a placebo, were injected intraperitoneally at the end of the surgery. By utilizing the 10 cm Visual-analogue-scale (VAS) we assessed post-operative pain at rest at 3, 8, and 24 h, and during ambulation at 8 and 24 h. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov. We conformed to the CONSORT recommendations. Between December 2016 and July 2019, a total of 119 patients were included in the study. Demographic and interventional characteristics were similar among the groups. The level of postoperative pain, either at rest or with change of position, was not significantly different between the groups, at all-time points. Application of subcutaneous and/or intraperitoneal analgesia is not effective in reducing pain after gynecologic operative laparoscopy. Clinical trial identification number: NCT02976571. Date of trial registration 11/29/2016. URL of the registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov .
format article
author Ohad Gluck
Elad Barber
Ohad Feldstein
Ori Tal
Ram Kerner
Ran Keidar
Inna Wolfson
Shimon Ginath
Jacob Bar
Ron Sagiv
author_facet Ohad Gluck
Elad Barber
Ohad Feldstein
Ori Tal
Ram Kerner
Ran Keidar
Inna Wolfson
Shimon Ginath
Jacob Bar
Ron Sagiv
author_sort Ohad Gluck
title The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/91b7ec522c664c27b97f39d3a0b4ec12
work_keys_str_mv AT ohadgluck theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eladbarber theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohadfeldstein theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT orital theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramkerner theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rankeidar theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT innawolfson theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimonginath theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jacobbar theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ronsagiv theeffectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohadgluck effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eladbarber effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohadfeldstein effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT orital effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramkerner effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rankeidar effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT innawolfson effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimonginath effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jacobbar effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ronsagiv effectofsubcutaneousandintraperitonealanesthesiaonpostlaparoscopicpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718395240503574528