Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication

The paper presents experimental evidence for the over-specification of small cardinalities in referential communication. The first experiment shows that when presented with a small set (2, 3, or 4) of unique objects, the speaker includes a numeral denoting a small cardinality into the description of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natalia Zevakhina, Lena Pasalskaya, Alisa Chinkova
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/91cdb2a45c0341baa5a31d0ce72879fd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:91cdb2a45c0341baa5a31d0ce72879fd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:91cdb2a45c0341baa5a31d0ce72879fd2021-12-01T12:01:10ZOver-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.745230https://doaj.org/article/91cdb2a45c0341baa5a31d0ce72879fd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745230/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078The paper presents experimental evidence for the over-specification of small cardinalities in referential communication. The first experiment shows that when presented with a small set (2, 3, or 4) of unique objects, the speaker includes a numeral denoting a small cardinality into the description of given objects, although it is over-informative for the hearer (e.g., “three stars”). On the contrary, when presented with a large set of unique objects, the speaker does not include a numeral denoting a large cardinality into their description, so she produces a bare plural (e.g., “stars”). The effect of small cardinalities resembles the effect of over-specifying color in referential communication, which has been extensively studied in recent years (cf. Tarenskeen et al., 2015; Rubio-Fernández, 2016, among many others). This suggests that, like color, small cardinalities are absolute and salient. The second experiment demonstrates that when presented with an identical small set of monochrome objects, the speaker over-specifies a small cardinality to a much greater extent than a color. This suggests that small cardinalities are even more salient than color. The third experiment reveals that when slides are flashed on the screen one by one, highlighted objects of small cardinalities are still over-specified. We argue that a plausible explanation for the salience of small cardinalities is a subitizing effect, which is the human capacity to instantaneously grasp small cardinalities.Natalia ZevakhinaLena PasalskayaAlisa ChinkovaFrontiers Media S.A.articleover-specificationinformativenessreferential communicationreference productionnumeralscolor adjectivesPsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic over-specification
informativeness
referential communication
reference production
numerals
color adjectives
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle over-specification
informativeness
referential communication
reference production
numerals
color adjectives
Psychology
BF1-990
Natalia Zevakhina
Lena Pasalskaya
Alisa Chinkova
Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication
description The paper presents experimental evidence for the over-specification of small cardinalities in referential communication. The first experiment shows that when presented with a small set (2, 3, or 4) of unique objects, the speaker includes a numeral denoting a small cardinality into the description of given objects, although it is over-informative for the hearer (e.g., “three stars”). On the contrary, when presented with a large set of unique objects, the speaker does not include a numeral denoting a large cardinality into their description, so she produces a bare plural (e.g., “stars”). The effect of small cardinalities resembles the effect of over-specifying color in referential communication, which has been extensively studied in recent years (cf. Tarenskeen et al., 2015; Rubio-Fernández, 2016, among many others). This suggests that, like color, small cardinalities are absolute and salient. The second experiment demonstrates that when presented with an identical small set of monochrome objects, the speaker over-specifies a small cardinality to a much greater extent than a color. This suggests that small cardinalities are even more salient than color. The third experiment reveals that when slides are flashed on the screen one by one, highlighted objects of small cardinalities are still over-specified. We argue that a plausible explanation for the salience of small cardinalities is a subitizing effect, which is the human capacity to instantaneously grasp small cardinalities.
format article
author Natalia Zevakhina
Lena Pasalskaya
Alisa Chinkova
author_facet Natalia Zevakhina
Lena Pasalskaya
Alisa Chinkova
author_sort Natalia Zevakhina
title Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication
title_short Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication
title_full Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication
title_fullStr Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication
title_full_unstemmed Over-Specification of Small Cardinalities in Referential Communication
title_sort over-specification of small cardinalities in referential communication
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/91cdb2a45c0341baa5a31d0ce72879fd
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliazevakhina overspecificationofsmallcardinalitiesinreferentialcommunication
AT lenapasalskaya overspecificationofsmallcardinalitiesinreferentialcommunication
AT alisachinkova overspecificationofsmallcardinalitiesinreferentialcommunication
_version_ 1718405244637937664