A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery

Fredric J Gross, Debra E Garcia-Zalisnak, Courtney E Bovee, Joy D Strawn Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA Abstract: In this randomized prospective study, the cumulative dissipated energy and case time of pop and chop and of traditional four-quadrant di...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gross FJ, Garcia-Zalisnak DE, Bovee CE, Strawn JD
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:	Cataract Surgery resident divide and conquer pop and chop CDE case time Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/91dd1ac630bf439ca2b9554f7988aabc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:91dd1ac630bf439ca2b9554f7988aabc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:91dd1ac630bf439ca2b9554f7988aabc2021-12-02T03:38:15ZA comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/91dd1ac630bf439ca2b9554f7988aabc2016-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-of-pop-and-chop-to-divide-and-conquer-in-resident-catarac-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Fredric J Gross, Debra E Garcia-Zalisnak, Courtney E Bovee, Joy D Strawn Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA Abstract: In this randomized prospective study, the cumulative dissipated energy and case time of pop and chop and of traditional four-quadrant divide and conquer in the first 60 cases (in total 120 eyes) of cataract surgery performed by two residents at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Hampton, Virginia, were compared. Overall and individually, the residents had significantly shorter case times and used significantly less cumulative dissipated energy for performing pop and chop than that for divide and conquer technique. There was no difference in complication rates or visual outcomes between these two techniques. The results of this study suggest that pop and chop is a more time- and energy-efficient method of nucleofractis than divide and conquer for novice resident surgeons. Keywords: case time, cataract surgery, phacoemulsification, cumulative dissipated energyGross FJGarcia-Zalisnak DEBovee CEStrawn JDDove Medical PressarticleCataract Surgeryresidentdivide and conquerpop and chopCDEcase timeOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1847-1851 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Cataract Surgery resident divide and conquer pop and chop CDE case time Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Cataract Surgery resident divide and conquer pop and chop CDE case time Ophthalmology RE1-994 Gross FJ Garcia-Zalisnak DE Bovee CE Strawn JD A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
description	Fredric J Gross, Debra E Garcia-Zalisnak, Courtney E Bovee, Joy D Strawn Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA Abstract: In this randomized prospective study, the cumulative dissipated energy and case time of pop and chop and of traditional four-quadrant divide and conquer in the first 60 cases (in total 120 eyes) of cataract surgery performed by two residents at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Hampton, Virginia, were compared. Overall and individually, the residents had significantly shorter case times and used significantly less cumulative dissipated energy for performing pop and chop than that for divide and conquer technique. There was no difference in complication rates or visual outcomes between these two techniques. The results of this study suggest that pop and chop is a more time- and energy-efficient method of nucleofractis than divide and conquer for novice resident surgeons. Keywords: case time, cataract surgery, phacoemulsification, cumulative dissipated energy
format	article
author	Gross FJ Garcia-Zalisnak DE Bovee CE Strawn JD
author_facet	Gross FJ Garcia-Zalisnak DE Bovee CE Strawn JD
author_sort	Gross FJ
title	A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
title_short	A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
title_full	A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
title_fullStr	A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed	A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
title_sort	comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/91dd1ac630bf439ca2b9554f7988aabc
work_keys_str_mv	AT grossfj acomparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT garciazalisnakde acomparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT boveece acomparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT strawnjd acomparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT grossfj comparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT garciazalisnakde comparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT boveece comparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery AT strawnjd comparisonofpopandchoptodivideandconquerinresidentcataractsurgery
_version_	1718401683333054464

A comparison of pop and chop to divide and conquer in resident cataract surgery

Ejemplares similares