Faith in Moderation

Much that has been written about political Islam emphasizes the negative images of suicide bombings, bearded and seemingly blind proponents of jihad, patriarchal gender ideologies, and intolerance toward non-Muslims. Jillian Schwedler’s comparative study of two “Islamist” political parties in Jorda...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Daniel Martin Varisco
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/91f27c075973428aab5ea32eb35aecae
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:91f27c075973428aab5ea32eb35aecae
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:91f27c075973428aab5ea32eb35aecae2021-12-02T19:23:16ZFaith in Moderation10.35632/ajis.v25i1.14932690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/91f27c075973428aab5ea32eb35aecae2008-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1493https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Much that has been written about political Islam emphasizes the negative images of suicide bombings, bearded and seemingly blind proponents of jihad, patriarchal gender ideologies, and intolerance toward non-Muslims. Jillian Schwedler’s comparative study of two “Islamist” political parties in Jordan and Yemen, respectively, is a welcome reminder that Muslims are just as capable of protecting their faith in moderation as anyone else. Her book provides a valuable record of the historical development of both Jordan’s Islamic Action Front (IAF: Jabhat al-`Aml al-Islami) and the Yemeni Congregation for Reform, better known simply as the Islah (Reform) party.A political scientist with first-hand experience in both countries, she has researched the previous literature on each party and conducted over three dozen formal on-the-record interviews with party officials and other relevant individuals (and more than 200 political actors overall, p. 31). The bulk of the interviews were conducted between 1995 and 1998, with follow-up trips as recently as 2003 ... Daniel Martin VariscoInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 25, Iss 1 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Daniel Martin Varisco
Faith in Moderation
description Much that has been written about political Islam emphasizes the negative images of suicide bombings, bearded and seemingly blind proponents of jihad, patriarchal gender ideologies, and intolerance toward non-Muslims. Jillian Schwedler’s comparative study of two “Islamist” political parties in Jordan and Yemen, respectively, is a welcome reminder that Muslims are just as capable of protecting their faith in moderation as anyone else. Her book provides a valuable record of the historical development of both Jordan’s Islamic Action Front (IAF: Jabhat al-`Aml al-Islami) and the Yemeni Congregation for Reform, better known simply as the Islah (Reform) party.A political scientist with first-hand experience in both countries, she has researched the previous literature on each party and conducted over three dozen formal on-the-record interviews with party officials and other relevant individuals (and more than 200 political actors overall, p. 31). The bulk of the interviews were conducted between 1995 and 1998, with follow-up trips as recently as 2003 ...
format article
author Daniel Martin Varisco
author_facet Daniel Martin Varisco
author_sort Daniel Martin Varisco
title Faith in Moderation
title_short Faith in Moderation
title_full Faith in Moderation
title_fullStr Faith in Moderation
title_full_unstemmed Faith in Moderation
title_sort faith in moderation
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/91f27c075973428aab5ea32eb35aecae
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmartinvarisco faithinmoderation
_version_ 1718376629692006400