An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors

In this article, I analyze the Speak & Spell electronic toy (Texas Instruments, 1978) from the perspective of the communication that it enables. I argue that such interactive devices can be seen as archives of future communication. As a media archaeologist working with electronic toys I often fi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nikita Braguinski
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: ScholarWorks @ UMass Amherst 2018
Materias:
P
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/92110771c0d54da5816e17893d30e196
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:92110771c0d54da5816e17893d30e196
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:92110771c0d54da5816e17893d30e1962021-11-17T15:24:16ZAn (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors10.7275/n59m-mp502380-6109https://doaj.org/article/92110771c0d54da5816e17893d30e1962018-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://scholarworks.umass.edu/cpo/vol7/iss1/8/https://doaj.org/toc/2380-6109In this article, I analyze the Speak & Spell electronic toy (Texas Instruments, 1978) from the perspective of the communication that it enables. I argue that such interactive devices can be seen as archives of future communication. As a media archaeologist working with electronic toys I often find the conceptualizations of these devices as mere tools for playing unsatisfactory. They seem to share more characteristics with archives than with instruments. Like archives, interactive toys hold in themselves a predefined choice of informations and interactions, thus enabling certain modes of inquiry and discouraging others. Especially the electronic toys that draw on algorithms and data to present the user with an imitation of human communication are able to offer branching paths of interlocution within their domain or topic. In the first part of this article I offer an explanation of the toy's technical structures that store speech and spelling data and enforce certain patterns of input and output between the device and its user. Then, I propose the use of the notion of the archive, or, alternatively, anarchive to describe the space of possibilities that defines this process of communication. In the last part I argue that the study of such algorithmic archives of possible communication needs to be based on interactive experimentation and can not be grounded in static recordings or descriptions alone.Nikita BraguinskiScholarWorks @ UMass AmherstarticleLanguage and LiteraturePCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96ENcommunication +1, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Language and Literature
P
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
spellingShingle Language and Literature
P
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Nikita Braguinski
An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors
description In this article, I analyze the Speak & Spell electronic toy (Texas Instruments, 1978) from the perspective of the communication that it enables. I argue that such interactive devices can be seen as archives of future communication. As a media archaeologist working with electronic toys I often find the conceptualizations of these devices as mere tools for playing unsatisfactory. They seem to share more characteristics with archives than with instruments. Like archives, interactive toys hold in themselves a predefined choice of informations and interactions, thus enabling certain modes of inquiry and discouraging others. Especially the electronic toys that draw on algorithms and data to present the user with an imitation of human communication are able to offer branching paths of interlocution within their domain or topic. In the first part of this article I offer an explanation of the toy's technical structures that store speech and spelling data and enforce certain patterns of input and output between the device and its user. Then, I propose the use of the notion of the archive, or, alternatively, anarchive to describe the space of possibilities that defines this process of communication. In the last part I argue that the study of such algorithmic archives of possible communication needs to be based on interactive experimentation and can not be grounded in static recordings or descriptions alone.
format article
author Nikita Braguinski
author_facet Nikita Braguinski
author_sort Nikita Braguinski
title An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors
title_short An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors
title_full An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors
title_fullStr An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors
title_full_unstemmed An (An)Archive of Communication: Interactive Toys as Interlocutors
title_sort (an)archive of communication: interactive toys as interlocutors
publisher ScholarWorks @ UMass Amherst
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/92110771c0d54da5816e17893d30e196
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitabraguinski ananarchiveofcommunicationinteractivetoysasinterlocutors
AT nikitabraguinski anarchiveofcommunicationinteractivetoysasinterlocutors
_version_ 1718425429589622784