Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex® Outcomes

Patricia Udaondo,1,2 Ana Hervas-Ontiveros,1,2 Amir Rosemblatt,3,4 Salvador Garcia-Delpech1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; 2Aiken Prevencción y Cirugía Ocular, Valencia, Spain; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, T...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Udaondo P, Hervas-Ontiveros A, Rosemblatt A, Garcia-Delpech S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9211288ec58c4a26884561a71f4512db
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9211288ec58c4a26884561a71f4512db
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9211288ec58c4a26884561a71f4512db2021-12-02T17:15:59ZImpact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/9211288ec58c4a26884561a71f4512db2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/impact-of-different-clinical-baseline-characteristics-on-intravitreal--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Patricia Udaondo,1,2 Ana Hervas-Ontiveros,1,2 Amir Rosemblatt,3,4 Salvador Garcia-Delpech1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; 2Aiken Prevencción y Cirugía Ocular, Valencia, Spain; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, IsraelCorrespondence: Patricia UdaondoAiken Prevención y Cirugía Ocular, Pizarro, 15 Bajo, Valencia, 46004, SpainTel +34 647869228Email patyudaondo@hotmail.comPurpose: To determine the impact of different baseline clinical characteristics on the improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) Ozurdex®.Methods: This was a single center retrospective study conducted on patients with DME, either naïve or previously treated, who were treated with one or more DEX and had a follow-up of at least 6 months. The main outcome measure was the proportion of DEX achieving an improvement ≥ 15 letters in BCVA.Results: The study analyzed 192 DEX implants administered to 97 eyes (65 patients). Among the 192 DEX analyzed, 57 (29.7%) implants achieved a BCVA improvement ≥ 15 letters (ETDRS) from baseline, with a mean time for achieving such improvement of 89.2 (39.7) days. Eyes who received an additional DEX and those with a duration of DME < 6 months had a greater probability of achieving a BCVA improvement ≥ 15 letters (odds-ratio: 2.55, p = 0.0028 and odds-ratio: 1.93, p = 0.0434). The mean (standard deviation) change in BCVA from baseline was 7.5 (14.5) letters, p < 0.0001. The mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline was − 128.0 (151.0) μm, p < 0.0001. The mean number of DEX implanted was 1.9 (0.8). Four (2.1%) DEX experienced an intraocular pressure increased ≥ 10 mm Hg; all the cases were successfully managed with topical antiglaucoma medication.Conclusion: The results of this study confirmed previous evidence suggesting that DEX is effective for improving BCVA and CMT in patients with DME.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, dexamethasone intravitreal implant, Ozurdex, best corrected visual acuity, central macular thicknessUdaondo PHervas-Ontiveros ARosemblatt AGarcia-Delpech SDove Medical Pressarticlediabetic macular edemadexamethasone intravitreal implantozurdexbest corrected visual acuitycentral macular thickness.OphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 15, Pp 4153-4162 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diabetic macular edema
dexamethasone intravitreal implant
ozurdex
best corrected visual acuity
central macular thickness.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle diabetic macular edema
dexamethasone intravitreal implant
ozurdex
best corrected visual acuity
central macular thickness.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Udaondo P
Hervas-Ontiveros A
Rosemblatt A
Garcia-Delpech S
Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes
description Patricia Udaondo,1,2 Ana Hervas-Ontiveros,1,2 Amir Rosemblatt,3,4 Salvador Garcia-Delpech1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; 2Aiken Prevencción y Cirugía Ocular, Valencia, Spain; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, IsraelCorrespondence: Patricia UdaondoAiken Prevención y Cirugía Ocular, Pizarro, 15 Bajo, Valencia, 46004, SpainTel +34 647869228Email patyudaondo@hotmail.comPurpose: To determine the impact of different baseline clinical characteristics on the improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) Ozurdex®.Methods: This was a single center retrospective study conducted on patients with DME, either naïve or previously treated, who were treated with one or more DEX and had a follow-up of at least 6 months. The main outcome measure was the proportion of DEX achieving an improvement ≥ 15 letters in BCVA.Results: The study analyzed 192 DEX implants administered to 97 eyes (65 patients). Among the 192 DEX analyzed, 57 (29.7%) implants achieved a BCVA improvement ≥ 15 letters (ETDRS) from baseline, with a mean time for achieving such improvement of 89.2 (39.7) days. Eyes who received an additional DEX and those with a duration of DME < 6 months had a greater probability of achieving a BCVA improvement ≥ 15 letters (odds-ratio: 2.55, p = 0.0028 and odds-ratio: 1.93, p = 0.0434). The mean (standard deviation) change in BCVA from baseline was 7.5 (14.5) letters, p < 0.0001. The mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline was − 128.0 (151.0) μm, p < 0.0001. The mean number of DEX implanted was 1.9 (0.8). Four (2.1%) DEX experienced an intraocular pressure increased ≥ 10 mm Hg; all the cases were successfully managed with topical antiglaucoma medication.Conclusion: The results of this study confirmed previous evidence suggesting that DEX is effective for improving BCVA and CMT in patients with DME.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, dexamethasone intravitreal implant, Ozurdex, best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness
format article
author Udaondo P
Hervas-Ontiveros A
Rosemblatt A
Garcia-Delpech S
author_facet Udaondo P
Hervas-Ontiveros A
Rosemblatt A
Garcia-Delpech S
author_sort Udaondo P
title Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes
title_short Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes
title_full Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes
title_fullStr Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Different Clinical Baseline Characteristics on Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Ozurdex&reg; Outcomes
title_sort impact of different clinical baseline characteristics on intravitreal dexamethasone implant ozurdex&reg; outcomes
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9211288ec58c4a26884561a71f4512db
work_keys_str_mv AT udaondop impactofdifferentclinicalbaselinecharacteristicsonintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantozurdexregoutcomes
AT hervasontiverosa impactofdifferentclinicalbaselinecharacteristicsonintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantozurdexregoutcomes
AT rosemblatta impactofdifferentclinicalbaselinecharacteristicsonintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantozurdexregoutcomes
AT garciadelpechs impactofdifferentclinicalbaselinecharacteristicsonintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantozurdexregoutcomes
_version_ 1718381214295916544