Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System

A hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor—Membrane Bioreactor (MBBR-MBR) was developed for the treatment of wastewater from a Spanish textile company. Compared with conventional activated sludge (CAS) treatment, the feasibility of this hybrid system to reduce economic and environmental impact on an indust...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xuefei Yang, Víctor López-Grimau
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/922150d1b5904352b0c9e1900ce58ec4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:922150d1b5904352b0c9e1900ce58ec4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:922150d1b5904352b0c9e1900ce58ec42021-11-25T18:20:08ZReduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System10.3390/membranes111108922077-0375https://doaj.org/article/922150d1b5904352b0c9e1900ce58ec42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/11/11/892https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0375A hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor—Membrane Bioreactor (MBBR-MBR) was developed for the treatment of wastewater from a Spanish textile company. Compared with conventional activated sludge (CAS) treatment, the feasibility of this hybrid system to reduce economic and environmental impact on an industrial scale was conducted. The results showed that, technically, the removal efficiency of COD, TSS and color reached 93%, 99% and 85%, respectively. The newly dyed fabrics performed with the treated wastewater were qualified under the standards of the textile industry. Economically, the values of Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) calculated for the hybrid MBBR-MBR system are profitable because of the reduction in Operational Expenditure (OPEX) when compared with CAS treatment, due to the lower effluent discharge tax thanks to the higher quality of the effluent and the decolorizing agent saved. The result of Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 18% suggested that MBBR-MBR is financially applicable for implantation into the industrial scale. The MBBR-MBR treatment also showed lower environmental impacts than the CAS process in the life cycle assessment (LCA) study, especially in the category of climate change, thanks to the avoidance of using extra decolorizing agent, a synthetic product based on a triamine.Xuefei YangVíctor López-GrimauMDPI AGarticletextile wastewatermoving bed biofilm reactormembrane bioreactoreconomic feasibilitylife cycle assessmentwater reuseChemical technologyTP1-1185Chemical engineeringTP155-156ENMembranes, Vol 11, Iss 892, p 892 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic textile wastewater
moving bed biofilm reactor
membrane bioreactor
economic feasibility
life cycle assessment
water reuse
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
spellingShingle textile wastewater
moving bed biofilm reactor
membrane bioreactor
economic feasibility
life cycle assessment
water reuse
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Xuefei Yang
Víctor López-Grimau
Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System
description A hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor—Membrane Bioreactor (MBBR-MBR) was developed for the treatment of wastewater from a Spanish textile company. Compared with conventional activated sludge (CAS) treatment, the feasibility of this hybrid system to reduce economic and environmental impact on an industrial scale was conducted. The results showed that, technically, the removal efficiency of COD, TSS and color reached 93%, 99% and 85%, respectively. The newly dyed fabrics performed with the treated wastewater were qualified under the standards of the textile industry. Economically, the values of Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) calculated for the hybrid MBBR-MBR system are profitable because of the reduction in Operational Expenditure (OPEX) when compared with CAS treatment, due to the lower effluent discharge tax thanks to the higher quality of the effluent and the decolorizing agent saved. The result of Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 18% suggested that MBBR-MBR is financially applicable for implantation into the industrial scale. The MBBR-MBR treatment also showed lower environmental impacts than the CAS process in the life cycle assessment (LCA) study, especially in the category of climate change, thanks to the avoidance of using extra decolorizing agent, a synthetic product based on a triamine.
format article
author Xuefei Yang
Víctor López-Grimau
author_facet Xuefei Yang
Víctor López-Grimau
author_sort Xuefei Yang
title Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System
title_short Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System
title_full Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System
title_fullStr Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System
title_sort reduction of cost and environmental impact in the treatment of textile wastewater using a combined mbbr-mbr system
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/922150d1b5904352b0c9e1900ce58ec4
work_keys_str_mv AT xuefeiyang reductionofcostandenvironmentalimpactinthetreatmentoftextilewastewaterusingacombinedmbbrmbrsystem
AT victorlopezgrimau reductionofcostandenvironmentalimpactinthetreatmentoftextilewastewaterusingacombinedmbbrmbrsystem
_version_ 1718411332242374656