Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss [RPL] is one of the most frustrating and difficult areas in reproductive medicine. Aim of the work: This prospective study aims to evaluate the roles of ultrasound and hysteroscopy in recurrent pregnancy loss. Patients and Methods: A total of 100 patients who h...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mohamed Farag, Mahmoud Mahmoud, Rashed Mohamed Rashed
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta) 2020
Materias:	pregnancy loss three-d ultrasound hysteroscopy infertility evaluation Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/923518de7bf04befb3fa33e2a1e33427
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:923518de7bf04befb3fa33e2a1e33427
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:923518de7bf04befb3fa33e2a1e334272021-12-02T14:02:00ZOffice Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss2636-41742682-378010.21608/ijma.2020.25674.1110https://doaj.org/article/923518de7bf04befb3fa33e2a1e334272020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_92260_253f6179d04bc6958f9814afab6764f4.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2636-4174https://doaj.org/toc/2682-3780Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss [RPL] is one of the most frustrating and difficult areas in reproductive medicine. Aim of the work: This prospective study aims to evaluate the roles of ultrasound and hysteroscopy in recurrent pregnancy loss. Patients and Methods: A total of 100 patients who had a history of two or more RPL had been included. All patients had been subjected to complete history taking, thorough clinical and gynecological examination, three-dimensional [3D] ultrasound and hysteroscopy. Results: The mean age was 27.43 years. In addition, 45% of the included females had two previous RPL while 55% of them had three or more RPL. Hysteroscopy revealed normal findings in 80 cases [80%], endometrial polyp in 7%, submucous myoma in 3%, uterine septum in 6%, and uterine synechiae in 4%. On the other side, three-dimensional ultrasound [3D US], normal findings had been detected in 83 cases [83%], endometrial polyp in 6%, submucous myoma in 3%, uterine septum in 5%, bicornuate uterus in 1%, and uterine synechiae in 2%. There was a statistically significant correlation between the two techniques in detection of the uterine findings in cases of RPL [p =0.001]. Conclusion: Three-dimensional ultrasonography is the best tool for diagnosis of different types of Mullerian duct anomalies whereas hysteroscopy is better in diagnosis of intracavitary lesions.Mohamed FaragMahmoud MahmoudRashed Mohamed RashedAl-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)articlepregnancy lossthree-d ultrasoundhysteroscopyinfertilityevaluationMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Medical Arts, Vol 2, Iss 3, Pp 542-546 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	pregnancy loss three-d ultrasound hysteroscopy infertility evaluation Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	pregnancy loss three-d ultrasound hysteroscopy infertility evaluation Medicine (General) R5-920 Mohamed Farag Mahmoud Mahmoud Rashed Mohamed Rashed Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
description	Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss [RPL] is one of the most frustrating and difficult areas in reproductive medicine. Aim of the work: This prospective study aims to evaluate the roles of ultrasound and hysteroscopy in recurrent pregnancy loss. Patients and Methods: A total of 100 patients who had a history of two or more RPL had been included. All patients had been subjected to complete history taking, thorough clinical and gynecological examination, three-dimensional [3D] ultrasound and hysteroscopy. Results: The mean age was 27.43 years. In addition, 45% of the included females had two previous RPL while 55% of them had three or more RPL. Hysteroscopy revealed normal findings in 80 cases [80%], endometrial polyp in 7%, submucous myoma in 3%, uterine septum in 6%, and uterine synechiae in 4%. On the other side, three-dimensional ultrasound [3D US], normal findings had been detected in 83 cases [83%], endometrial polyp in 6%, submucous myoma in 3%, uterine septum in 5%, bicornuate uterus in 1%, and uterine synechiae in 2%. There was a statistically significant correlation between the two techniques in detection of the uterine findings in cases of RPL [p =0.001]. Conclusion: Three-dimensional ultrasonography is the best tool for diagnosis of different types of Mullerian duct anomalies whereas hysteroscopy is better in diagnosis of intracavitary lesions.
format	article
author	Mohamed Farag Mahmoud Mahmoud Rashed Mohamed Rashed
author_facet	Mohamed Farag Mahmoud Mahmoud Rashed Mohamed Rashed
author_sort	Mohamed Farag
title	Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_short	Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_full	Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_fullStr	Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_full_unstemmed	Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_sort	office hysteroscopy versus three-dimensional ultrasound in assessment of uterine cavity in recurrent pregnancy loss
publisher	Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/923518de7bf04befb3fa33e2a1e33427
work_keys_str_mv	AT mohamedfarag officehysteroscopyversusthreedimensionalultrasoundinassessmentofuterinecavityinrecurrentpregnancyloss AT mahmoudmahmoud officehysteroscopyversusthreedimensionalultrasoundinassessmentofuterinecavityinrecurrentpregnancyloss AT rashedmohamedrashed officehysteroscopyversusthreedimensionalultrasoundinassessmentofuterinecavityinrecurrentpregnancyloss
_version_	1718392095205490688

Office Hysteroscopy Versus Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Assessment of Uterine Cavity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Ejemplares similares