Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are crucial for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high thromboembolic risk. However, in AF patients at intermediate thromboembolic risk with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor (CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 in men, 2 in women), guidelines advise to conside...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An De Sutter, Lies Lahousse, Stephane Steurbaut, Maxim Grymonprez
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/92506f1dabd54051ae3f609b10094a51
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:92506f1dabd54051ae3f609b10094a51
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:92506f1dabd54051ae3f609b10094a512021-11-25T02:00:05ZImpact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1136/openhrt-2020-0014652053-3624https://doaj.org/article/92506f1dabd54051ae3f609b10094a512020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/2/e001465.fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2053-3624Aims Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are crucial for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high thromboembolic risk. However, in AF patients at intermediate thromboembolic risk with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor (CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 in men, 2 in women), guidelines advise to consider starting anticoagulation, which may result in OAC non-initiation due to underestimation of the thromboembolic risk of a single stroke risk factor and overestimation of the OAC-related bleeding risk. A critical appraisal of the role of OACs and the benefit–risk profile of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this patient subgroup are needed.Methods and results This systematic review provides an overview of literature on the effectiveness and safety of OACs in AF patients with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor after searching Medline and Embase. Differences between individual stroke risk factors regarding the ischaemic stroke risk in non-anticoagulated AF patients are identified in a meta-analysis, demonstrating the highest increased risk in patients aged 65–74 years old or with diabetes mellitus, followed by heart failure, hypertension and vascular disease. Furthermore, meta-analysis results favour NOACs over VKAs, given their equal effectiveness and superior safety in AF patients at intermediate thromboembolic risk (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.34 for stroke or systemic embolism; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.80 for major bleeding; HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.59 for intracranial bleeding; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.71 for mortality).Conclusion Our systematic review with meta-analysis favours the use of anticoagulation in AF patients with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor, especially when age ≥65 years or diabetes mellitus is present, with a preference for NOACs over VKAs.An De SutterLies LahousseStephane SteurbautMaxim GrymonprezBMJ Publishing GrouparticleDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENOpen Heart, Vol 7, Iss 2 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
An De Sutter
Lies Lahousse
Stephane Steurbaut
Maxim Grymonprez
Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description Aims Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are crucial for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high thromboembolic risk. However, in AF patients at intermediate thromboembolic risk with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor (CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 in men, 2 in women), guidelines advise to consider starting anticoagulation, which may result in OAC non-initiation due to underestimation of the thromboembolic risk of a single stroke risk factor and overestimation of the OAC-related bleeding risk. A critical appraisal of the role of OACs and the benefit–risk profile of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this patient subgroup are needed.Methods and results This systematic review provides an overview of literature on the effectiveness and safety of OACs in AF patients with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor after searching Medline and Embase. Differences between individual stroke risk factors regarding the ischaemic stroke risk in non-anticoagulated AF patients are identified in a meta-analysis, demonstrating the highest increased risk in patients aged 65–74 years old or with diabetes mellitus, followed by heart failure, hypertension and vascular disease. Furthermore, meta-analysis results favour NOACs over VKAs, given their equal effectiveness and superior safety in AF patients at intermediate thromboembolic risk (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.34 for stroke or systemic embolism; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.80 for major bleeding; HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.59 for intracranial bleeding; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.71 for mortality).Conclusion Our systematic review with meta-analysis favours the use of anticoagulation in AF patients with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor, especially when age ≥65 years or diabetes mellitus is present, with a preference for NOACs over VKAs.
format article
author An De Sutter
Lies Lahousse
Stephane Steurbaut
Maxim Grymonprez
author_facet An De Sutter
Lies Lahousse
Stephane Steurbaut
Maxim Grymonprez
author_sort An De Sutter
title Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort impact of a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor on atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/92506f1dabd54051ae3f609b10094a51
work_keys_str_mv AT andesutter impactofasinglenonsexrelatedstrokeriskfactoronatrialfibrillationandoralanticoagulantoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lieslahousse impactofasinglenonsexrelatedstrokeriskfactoronatrialfibrillationandoralanticoagulantoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stephanesteurbaut impactofasinglenonsexrelatedstrokeriskfactoronatrialfibrillationandoralanticoagulantoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maximgrymonprez impactofasinglenonsexrelatedstrokeriskfactoronatrialfibrillationandoralanticoagulantoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718414707302334464