Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation

Abstract Background The term “continued influence effect” (CIE) refers to the phenomenon that discredited and obsolete information continues to affect behavior and beliefs. The practical relevance of this work is particularly apparent as we confront fake news everyday. Thus, an important question be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irene P. Kan, Kendra L. Pizzonia, Anna B. Drummey, Eli J. V. Mikkelsen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/925a7ffd7c4d409f9f480634a08e67a3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:925a7ffd7c4d409f9f480634a08e67a3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:925a7ffd7c4d409f9f480634a08e67a32021-11-28T12:28:05ZExploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation10.1186/s41235-021-00335-92365-7464https://doaj.org/article/925a7ffd7c4d409f9f480634a08e67a32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00335-9https://doaj.org/toc/2365-7464Abstract Background The term “continued influence effect” (CIE) refers to the phenomenon that discredited and obsolete information continues to affect behavior and beliefs. The practical relevance of this work is particularly apparent as we confront fake news everyday. Thus, an important question becomes, how can we mitigate the continued influence of misinformation? Decades of research have identified several factors that contribute to the CIE reduction, but few have reported successful elimination. Across three studies, we evaluated the relative contribution of three factors (i.e., targeting the misinformation, providing an alternative explanation, and relative importance of the misinformation content) to the reduction of the CIE. Results Across three studies and two different CIE measures, we found that alternative provision consistently resulted in CIE reduction. Furthermore, under certain conditions, the combination of alternative inclusion and direct targeting of misinformation in the correction statement resulted in successful elimination of the CIE, such that individuals who encountered that type of correction behaved similarly to baseline participants who never encountered the (mis)information. In contrast, under one CIE measure, participants who received correction statements that failed to include those elements referenced the (mis)information as frequently as baseline participants who never encountered a correction. Finally, we delineated several component processes involved in misinformation outdating and found that the extent of outdating success varied as a function of the causality of misinformation. Conclusions The damaging effects of fake news are undeniable, and the negative consequences are exacerbated in the digital age. Our results contribute to our understanding of how fake news persists and how we may begin to mitigate their effects.Irene P. KanKendra L. PizzoniaAnna B. DrummeyEli J. V. MikkelsenSpringerOpenarticleMisinformationcontinued influence effectSituation modelConsciousness. CognitionBF309-499ENCognitive Research, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-33 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Misinformation
continued influence effect
Situation model
Consciousness. Cognition
BF309-499
spellingShingle Misinformation
continued influence effect
Situation model
Consciousness. Cognition
BF309-499
Irene P. Kan
Kendra L. Pizzonia
Anna B. Drummey
Eli J. V. Mikkelsen
Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
description Abstract Background The term “continued influence effect” (CIE) refers to the phenomenon that discredited and obsolete information continues to affect behavior and beliefs. The practical relevance of this work is particularly apparent as we confront fake news everyday. Thus, an important question becomes, how can we mitigate the continued influence of misinformation? Decades of research have identified several factors that contribute to the CIE reduction, but few have reported successful elimination. Across three studies, we evaluated the relative contribution of three factors (i.e., targeting the misinformation, providing an alternative explanation, and relative importance of the misinformation content) to the reduction of the CIE. Results Across three studies and two different CIE measures, we found that alternative provision consistently resulted in CIE reduction. Furthermore, under certain conditions, the combination of alternative inclusion and direct targeting of misinformation in the correction statement resulted in successful elimination of the CIE, such that individuals who encountered that type of correction behaved similarly to baseline participants who never encountered the (mis)information. In contrast, under one CIE measure, participants who received correction statements that failed to include those elements referenced the (mis)information as frequently as baseline participants who never encountered a correction. Finally, we delineated several component processes involved in misinformation outdating and found that the extent of outdating success varied as a function of the causality of misinformation. Conclusions The damaging effects of fake news are undeniable, and the negative consequences are exacerbated in the digital age. Our results contribute to our understanding of how fake news persists and how we may begin to mitigate their effects.
format article
author Irene P. Kan
Kendra L. Pizzonia
Anna B. Drummey
Eli J. V. Mikkelsen
author_facet Irene P. Kan
Kendra L. Pizzonia
Anna B. Drummey
Eli J. V. Mikkelsen
author_sort Irene P. Kan
title Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
title_short Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
title_full Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
title_fullStr Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
title_full_unstemmed Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
title_sort exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/925a7ffd7c4d409f9f480634a08e67a3
work_keys_str_mv AT irenepkan exploringfactorsthatmitigatethecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformation
AT kendralpizzonia exploringfactorsthatmitigatethecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformation
AT annabdrummey exploringfactorsthatmitigatethecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformation
AT elijvmikkelsen exploringfactorsthatmitigatethecontinuedinfluenceofmisinformation
_version_ 1718407969460191232