Eficiência no Desenvolvimento Regional Resultante do Programa Bolsa Família. Aplicação da Análise Envoltória de Dados (DEA) nos Estados e Regiões Brasileiras de 2004 a 2010
AbstractThe objective of this study consists in analyzing the efficiency of the Bolsa Familia Program in theregional development of the twenty-six Brazilian states and the Federal District, as well as the fiveBrazilian regions in the period of 2004 to 2012, by using the methodology of Data Envelopme...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | PT |
| Publicado: |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9271de33d0e3411d90e7919118c9f21a |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | AbstractThe objective of this study consists in analyzing the efficiency of the Bolsa Familia Program in theregional development of the twenty-six Brazilian states and the Federal District, as well as the fiveBrazilian regions in the period of 2004 to 2012, by using the methodology of Data EnvelopmentAnalysis (DEA). Based on the different scales assigned to the variables, two models were developedwith the basic method of Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) and oriented to the products. Model 1 hasno scale restriction between the variables, while model 2 has this characteristic. The results show thatthe process of efficiency of program management in the Brazilian regional development is divergentin different states. Thus, the state of Acre, Amapá, Federal District, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul, Riode Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Roraima, Santa Catarina and São Paulo, according to the models ofstudy, present a high performance of efficiency in the regional development of the program results.In the other hand, Alagoas, Amazonas, Maranhão, Pará and Pernambuco are the states with lessefficient processes, determined by the models studied. In the analysis of the regions, it appears thatthe South and Southeast have, in general, a better efficiency in the program development, while theNortheast presented the least efficient process. |
|---|