Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Abstract Background The number of patients with chronic heart failure is increasing in Japan. However, the annual number of patients with heart failure who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been constant in the last few years. In this study, we evaluated patients who did not receiv...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/92a1589fb7274f11928c985007170edc |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:92a1589fb7274f11928c985007170edc |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:92a1589fb7274f11928c985007170edc2021-12-02T08:25:11ZEvaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction1883-21481880-427610.1002/joa3.12647https://doaj.org/article/92a1589fb7274f11928c985007170edc2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12647https://doaj.org/toc/1880-4276https://doaj.org/toc/1883-2148Abstract Background The number of patients with chronic heart failure is increasing in Japan. However, the annual number of patients with heart failure who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been constant in the last few years. In this study, we evaluated patients who did not receive CRT despite being eligible for this treatment to elucidate the clinical impact of CRT administration. Methods We assessed 214 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% (excluding patients treated with CRT) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography between January and May 2020 at our institution. The patients were stratified into two groups: Group A (n = 26; patients eligible for CRT) and Group B (n = 188; patients ineligible for CRT); however, all patients only received pharmacological therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of these patients with respect to the cumulative number of hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths. Results We observed no significant between‐group differences in age, sex, and severity/diagnosis of organic heart disease. Group A had a significantly higher number of hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths than Group B (log‐rank test, P < .01; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.31‐7.09; average follow‐up period, 675 days). Conclusions This study shows that 12% of patients were eligible for CRT. However, the implantation rate was low and no one was implanted. CRT is underutilized in patients who have heart failure with reduced LVEF. Therefore, we strongly recommend CRT for patients with indications for CRT.Makoto TakanoYui NakayamaHisao MatsudaTomoo HaradaYoshihiro J. AkashiWileyarticlecardiac resynchronization therapyguidelineheart failureimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorleft bundle branch blockDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENJournal of Arrhythmia, Vol 37, Iss 6, Pp 1532-1536 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
cardiac resynchronization therapy guideline heart failure implantable cardioverter defibrillator left bundle branch block Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 |
spellingShingle |
cardiac resynchronization therapy guideline heart failure implantable cardioverter defibrillator left bundle branch block Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Makoto Takano Yui Nakayama Hisao Matsuda Tomoo Harada Yoshihiro J. Akashi Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
description |
Abstract Background The number of patients with chronic heart failure is increasing in Japan. However, the annual number of patients with heart failure who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been constant in the last few years. In this study, we evaluated patients who did not receive CRT despite being eligible for this treatment to elucidate the clinical impact of CRT administration. Methods We assessed 214 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% (excluding patients treated with CRT) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography between January and May 2020 at our institution. The patients were stratified into two groups: Group A (n = 26; patients eligible for CRT) and Group B (n = 188; patients ineligible for CRT); however, all patients only received pharmacological therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of these patients with respect to the cumulative number of hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths. Results We observed no significant between‐group differences in age, sex, and severity/diagnosis of organic heart disease. Group A had a significantly higher number of hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiogenic deaths than Group B (log‐rank test, P < .01; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.31‐7.09; average follow‐up period, 675 days). Conclusions This study shows that 12% of patients were eligible for CRT. However, the implantation rate was low and no one was implanted. CRT is underutilized in patients who have heart failure with reduced LVEF. Therefore, we strongly recommend CRT for patients with indications for CRT. |
format |
article |
author |
Makoto Takano Yui Nakayama Hisao Matsuda Tomoo Harada Yoshihiro J. Akashi |
author_facet |
Makoto Takano Yui Nakayama Hisao Matsuda Tomoo Harada Yoshihiro J. Akashi |
author_sort |
Makoto Takano |
title |
Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_short |
Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_full |
Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_sort |
evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/92a1589fb7274f11928c985007170edc |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT makototakano evaluationofpotentialunderuseofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyforheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT yuinakayama evaluationofpotentialunderuseofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyforheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT hisaomatsuda evaluationofpotentialunderuseofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyforheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT tomooharada evaluationofpotentialunderuseofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyforheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT yoshihirojakashi evaluationofpotentialunderuseofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyforheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction |
_version_ |
1718398556896755712 |